Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]TBF
(37,518 posts)29. Who is she? A physicist.
I am just starting to learn about the GMO issue as I generally tend to value science and it's methods (peer review, replicating studies etc). I post this simply so folks can look at the page and see that she is not a right-wing lunatic. But I don't know enough about GMO or Golden Rice (which seems to be a major issue right now) to draw any conclusions. Definitely an area where I need to read/research more. Here is what I found on wiki:
Vandana Shiva (Hindi: वंदना शिवा: born 5 November 1952) is an Indian environmental activist and anti-globalization author.[2] Shiva, currently based in Delhi, has authored more than 20 books.[3] She was trained as a physicist and received her Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Philosophy from the University of Western Ontario, Canada, in 1978 with the doctoral dissertation "Hidden variables and locality in quantum theory."[4][5]
She is one of the leaders and board members of the International Forum on Globalization, (along with Jerry Mander, Edward Goldsmith, Ralph Nader, Jeremy Rifkin, et al.), and a figure of the global solidarity movement known as the alter-globalization movement. She has argued for the wisdom of many traditional practices, as is evident from her interview in the book Vedic Ecology (by Ranchor Prime) that draws upon India's Vedic heritage. She is a member of the scientific committee of the Fundacion IDEAS, Spain's Socialist Party's think tank. She is also a member of the International Organization for a Participatory Society.[6] She received the Right Livelihood Award in 1993, and numerous other prizes.
Source: wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandana_Shiva)
Golden rice
Shiva also opposes Golden rice, which, according scientific experts, could prevent millions of children from becoming blind every year and alleviate vitamin A deficiency of 250 million people in the developing countries.[19] Shiva said that the women of Bengal grow and eat 150 greens which can do the same.[19] Martina McGloughlin, director of the biotechnology program at the University of California at Davis angrily compared this to Marie Antoinette, who said that the peasants should eat cake if they don't have bread. The Nutrition Foundation of India's study of indigenous food in India confirms that there are plants with much higher beta carotene than what is being touted to be the selling point of 'Golden Rice' [20] Doctor Patrick Moore writes that most of these 250 million children don't eat much else than a bowl of rice a day.[21] Doctor Adrian Dubock says that golden rice is as cheap as other rice and vitamin A deficiency is the greatest reason for blindness and also causes 28% of global preschool child mortality.[22]
Shiva argues that Golden Rice is more harmful than beneficial in her scientific explanation of what she calls the "Golden Rice" hoax: "Unfortunately, Vitamin A rice is a hoax, and will bring further dispute to plant genetic engineering where public relations exercises seem to have replaced science in promotion of untested, unproven and unnecessary technology... This is a recipe for creating hunger and malnutrition, not solving it."[23]
At the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the director of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Ismail Serageldin, asked: "do you want 2 to 3 million children a year to go blind and 1 million to die of vitamin A deficiency, just because you object to the way golden rice was created?"[19]
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
172 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Probably because the GMO issue is not as cut and dried as some make it out to be
Major Nikon
May 2014
#4
Vandana Shiva is someone who knows damn well how multinational corporate agribiz is destroying
scarletwoman
May 2014
#3
Again, you have no reason to label. You just want to be the center of the universe.
HuckleB
May 2014
#103
Can you prove that cross breeding with food that i am allergic to wont cause a reaction?
bravenak
May 2014
#119
The reality is that you are safer with GMO than you would be otherwise in that regard
Major Nikon
May 2014
#131
So what if I want to know if the produce I buy has been fertilized by cow shit?
Major Nikon
May 2014
#139
There's a difference between having access to the information and labeling
Major Nikon
May 2014
#144
There is almost no commercially produced food that isn't genetically modified
Major Nikon
May 2014
#126
Monsanto and their spawns are very afraid of "labels".. they also do not want to tell
Cha
May 2014
#162
They've given us no reason to "trust" them.. with their sleazy orwellian bullshit. nm
Cha
May 2014
#165
Any links to studies of long term human consumption of hybrids created by other technologies?
HuckleB
May 2014
#46
It appears that you don't know what a strawman is, even though you sure build enough of them.
HuckleB
May 2014
#106
My point is that I don't believe that all the science around GMOs is clean.
DisgustipatedinCA
May 2014
#63
If GMO foods are so beneficial why does Monsanto (and others) oppose labeling it GMO?
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2014
#44
It seems a valid question. Why does Monsanto oppose labeling their product?
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2014
#104
Not really. Monsanto is trying to fulfill it's own prophecy about it's product being beneficial.
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2014
#132
For the same reasons organic producers would oppose labeling their use of cow shit fertilizer
Major Nikon
May 2014
#151
My two cents. If GMO's are fine, then GMO companies shouldn't fight against labeling. Period.
ancianita
May 2014
#117
The whole strategy of nature being for sale seems to be what this is all about, yeah.
ancianita
May 2014
#146
Thanks For the OP - You have shined the light of Truth on Corporate GMO Lies.
Tommymac
May 2014
#170