Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
57. Hold on a second.
Tue May 27, 2014, 09:04 AM
May 2014

Sexual desire is a product of testosterone. That's instinctual and unavoidable, and I am pretty sure that science backs me up on this.

The fact that men are taught "big boys don't cry" is a social construct. That's learned behavior, passed down from mothers to their sons for centuries (if not millennia). And there's probably a good reason for that. My mother wasn't stupid, and I refuse to believe that mothers (for centuries) have been stupid. They taught their male children that "big boys don't cry" for a long time because they knew that their boys needed love and a mate, and they knew that most women would not choose a "wimp" as a sexual partner, so they taught their boys to be "strong" and to repress their emotions. That makes good, biological sense to me.

As such, it's not testosterone that "teaches" men "not to feel." Mostly, it's mothers who teach their boys not to express emotion (and they do so for very good reasons--unless you want to argue that most mothers are stupid, and I refuse to believe that).

As to your central question--what is the point of arguing what I am arguing? That's a completely fair question, but I am not sure how to respond to it. Here's what I told bostonbean in another thread:

My purpose is to understand so that I can craft a working solution. Yours seems to be to educate and condemn (i.e. create social pressure), because it appears you already have a firm opinion on the nature of the problem and the proper solution. I don't share your confidence. I am looking for answers that will be more descriptive and strategies that will be more effective.

I don't deny that education and condemnation are useful tools for shaping social norms and even government policy, but neither of those strategies will get more men to vote for Democrats. Too many men (and the women who love them) vote against their best interests, and that's what I am trying to change. That's also why I need different strategies than the ones you are comfortable with. Condemnation and education, from what I can tell, push many people into the waiting arms of organizations aligned with the Republican Party (i.e. the masculinist NRA and patriarchal fundamentalist Christianity). It's time for new strategies.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5005385


That's my purpose. Condemnation and education work well on children, and it's not surprising to me that many women fall back on those strategies (as they do most of the childrearing), but those strategies fail to persuade adults because those strategies are condescending.

All that said (and I have laid out my premises for you in the hope of creating understanding), rather than my searching for what you describe as "the actual problem," would you be so kind as to tell me what you think "the actual problem" is? I would appreciate it if you did.

-Laelth
I've never watched The Wall in it's entirety. I will have to do so. octoberlib May 2014 #1
I hope you do. Laelth May 2014 #4
Actually, rrneck May 2014 #6
Umm ... Laelth May 2014 #8
It certainly seems counterintuitive but it's true. rrneck May 2014 #12
Thanks for that link. Laelth May 2014 #50
That's complete bollocks. He doesn't argue anything of the sort. muriel_volestrangler May 2014 #18
I disagree with your interpretation. Laelth May 2014 #19
No, that's just total nonsense muriel_volestrangler May 2014 #21
Thank you for your posts about this. redqueen May 2014 #23
Interestingly Nuclear Unicorn May 2014 #32
Indeed, he says nothing about WW I. Laelth May 2014 #33
You are trying to conflate war and the character's personal problems muriel_volestrangler May 2014 #34
Another few pieces of evidence. Laelth May 2014 #37
They are things the character might do muriel_volestrangler May 2014 #42
Drop bombs? Seriously? Laelth May 2014 #61
to say nothing of the fact DonCoquixote May 2014 #43
If you taught rhetoric than I ask you to step back and look for a larger, overarching theme KittyWampus May 2014 #2
You nailed it when you mentioned the Middle East. Laelth May 2014 #3
The bong is strong with this one. AngryAmish May 2014 #5
LOL Tuesday Afternoon May 2014 #17
+1 Agreed n/t PasadenaTrudy May 2014 #7
Thanks. n/t Laelth May 2014 #69
So men were never violent before women's liberation movements? davidn3600 May 2014 #9
Humans are violent. Laelth May 2014 #10
So the invention of bigger and better guns and war machines had nothing to do with it? davidn3600 May 2014 #11
True. Laelth May 2014 #13
wow. that's pretty horrifying. Sheri May 2014 #14
Either will work. Laelth May 2014 #48
we have often talked about the backlash resulting from so much success of women over a small seabeyond May 2014 #15
Indeed, but do you talk about men? Laelth May 2014 #30
all. the fuckin. time. that is my life. seabeyond May 2014 #39
Smile. I hear you. Laelth May 2014 #40
but most importantly. i listen to them. nt seabeyond May 2014 #41
this obssession by the gun 'enthusiasts' heaven05 May 2014 #16
There are over 80,000,000 gun-owners, enthused or otherwise... Eleanors38 May 2014 #24
3quarterbillion guns in this country alone heaven05 May 2014 #31
A lot of guns, but more like 300+ million. There is one course Eleanors38 May 2014 #35
that's okay on the link heaven05 May 2014 #44
The country may be sliding to hell in a handbasket, Eleanors38 May 2014 #51
My pleasure. n/t Laelth May 2014 #46
Good points. fried eggs May 2014 #20
Thanks. Laelth May 2014 #29
Since women constitute the fastest growing gun-owning demographic Eleanors38 May 2014 #22
No clue, but I welcome the discussion. Laelth May 2014 #28
Gender was this shooter's motive treestar May 2014 #25
no, nothing to do with guns Skittles May 2014 #26
As the clip I posted demonstrates ... Laelth May 2014 #27
problem seems to be men unable to handle change Skittles May 2014 #36
We have all suffered from the backlash, I think. Laelth May 2014 #38
We fight to amend the Second Amendment. The existence of guns prevents the very conversations ancianita May 2014 #45
I would like Mr. Moore to answer his own question. Laelth May 2014 #47
+1000 LAGC May 2014 #53
It really is a gun problem Crunchy Frog May 2014 #62
The Second Amendment is not your problem hack89 May 2014 #58
Added just to keep my thoughts on the same page. Laelth May 2014 #60
On misogyny and misandry. Laelth May 2014 #49
love and desire. seabeyond May 2014 #52
I've been saying "testosterone is an evil master" for a long time. Laelth May 2014 #55
that has nothing to do with love and desire. that has nothing to do with being fearful seabeyond May 2014 #56
Hold on a second. Laelth May 2014 #57
Post removed Post removed May 2014 #54
My response to XemaSab (above). Laelth May 2014 #59
The purpose of this thread (cross-posted). Laelth May 2014 #63
I read something by someone who never once talked about giving of themselves…. Tikki May 2014 #64
I admire and appreciate the spirit of this post. Laelth May 2014 #65
I thank you for your posts in this thread dreamnightwind May 2014 #66
You are very kind. Thanks. n/t Laelth May 2014 #67
It is not our responsibility to fix all the "broken" people of the world. Laelth May 2014 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"What shall we do no...»Reply #57