Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pacalo

(24,857 posts)
13. I like both of them.
Sat Mar 31, 2012, 08:49 PM
Mar 2012

As I commented in other threads:

I think the problems stem from the fact that Keith is a perfectionist with high moral ethics.

If Keith gave them hell, it was for a good reason. If I remember correctly, Keith was promised a lot of things by Current TV; they didn't deliver as promised. That's not something Keith would excuse.

I stand by Keith regardless of what happened. If not for him, MSNBC would have only "Hardball" on its programming. Keith opened a huge door for progressives.

Keith got along just fine at MSNBC until Comcast took over & started leaning on him. He admits he made a mistake going to Current-TV. I suspect he puts a lot of work into his nightly shows & it must have been frustrating that he could get only a fraction of the audience he was getting on MSNBC. Current-TV's executives should have made more of an effort to have its network broadcasted on more cable outlets.

Getting out of two difficult situations spaced closely together doesn't necessarily amount to a KO problem. He's a perfectionist who gives us an impeccable performance with every program: the content, the writing, the production. His was the only newscast I looked forward to; everyone else that I watch doesn't come close to being as entertaining or thought-provoking as Keith Olbermann.

Seeing how many are so easily influenced, I'm afraid that any news spin that takes hold against Keith could prevent anyone else from hiring him. Wildfires are hard to put out. How sad for us.

I'll never forget what Keith Olbermann has done for us. I couldn't care less that he had issues with his co-workers.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It is not a matter of rooting. Can Olbermann not get along with anyone? Jennicut Mar 2012 #1
Agree, Keith has a huge "I am important problem" and I think he will be the loser. He teddy51 Mar 2012 #11
Well that's divisive... YvonneCa Mar 2012 #2
Multimillion dollar lawsuits generally are Egalitariat Mar 2012 #5
Yes. And media will use the exact tactics... YvonneCa Mar 2012 #27
There is nothing to 'root' for. Ruby the Liberal Mar 2012 #3
Meh. None of the above. eggplant aubergine Mar 2012 #4
both. neither. SteveABG Mar 2012 #6
nobody, because we are the real losers in this fight. niyad Mar 2012 #7
+1 nadine_mn Mar 2012 #8
I caught the first few minutes of "viewpoint" last night--and it was pretty obvious that this has niyad Mar 2012 #23
The worst of it is this A wise Man Apr 2012 #44
Bingo! Cleita Mar 2012 #9
Exactly. n/t YvonneCa Mar 2012 #28
Gore by TKO in the 1st. cherokeeprogressive Mar 2012 #10
If you believe in truth, justice and the law (naive, I know) The Philosopher Mar 2012 #12
I like both of them. pacalo Mar 2012 #13
Neither will I... YvonneCa Mar 2012 #29
That video is a good representation of the reporting we should be protecting. pacalo Mar 2012 #30
I agree about the reporting. Back then, real reporting was... YvonneCa Apr 2012 #31
I don't forget those days, either. The "what have you done for me lately" attitude pacalo Apr 2012 #43
I agree. That and the 'I care about policy, not personality' argument... YvonneCa Apr 2012 #45
I agree 100% truebrit71 Apr 2012 #51
I don't care one way or the other. To me, issues matter. Personalities don't. nt Speck Tater Mar 2012 #14
Root for? Is it a sporting event? MineralMan Mar 2012 #15
Gore Life Long Dem Mar 2012 #16
Mr. Gore otohara Mar 2012 #17
I don't have enough skin in this game to really pick a side. backscatter712 Mar 2012 #18
Root? It's like the Packers playing the Raiders. They're two of my favorite teams aint_no_life_nowhere Mar 2012 #19
Know how you feel. Yavapai Mar 2012 #24
I'll be rooting for the little guy. Major Hogwash Mar 2012 #20
I always side with talent, not managment, in disputes around contracts. Bluenorthwest Mar 2012 #21
What kind of stupid question is this titaniumsalute Mar 2012 #22
Will we ever learn? meanit Mar 2012 #25
Olvermann was fired. Al Gore ... quit. Loudmxr Mar 2012 #26
Can we get Keith to replace Biden on the ticket? kudzu22 Apr 2012 #32
That, would be awesome! Hawkowl Apr 2012 #33
You'd love it, we'd lose in a landslide. Ikonoklast Apr 2012 #37
You have no faith in Obama? Hawkowl Apr 2012 #39
Yes. And he's not stupid. Ikonoklast Apr 2012 #40
I'd 'root' for the journalist in this case bigtree Apr 2012 #34
neither/both AtomicKitten Apr 2012 #35
Whichever one the Supreme Court picks cthulu2016 Apr 2012 #36
Are they going to attemp to try to measure their egos or something? RB TexLa Apr 2012 #38
Definitely Gore RZM Apr 2012 #41
If we're going to pit one against the other, Gore wins the "plays nicely with others" category. pacalo Apr 2012 #42
Neither. I had hoped they both would be successful. jillan Apr 2012 #46
If I had to choose sides, I'd choose Al Gore's hifiguy Apr 2012 #47
I find it prudent to not get involved in the clash of monumental egos. n/t Egalitarian Thug Apr 2012 #48
Gore wins hands down. Olbermann's history tells it all. Pisces Apr 2012 #49
I hate to say this, but President Gore librechik Apr 2012 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Olbermann v. Gore: who w...»Reply #13