Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Casting the Ideal Challenger to Hillary Clinton [View all]
Jim Webb, the former Democratic senator from Virginia, stirred the political pot this past week, saying he was considering a presidential run in 2016. Webb was a moderate when he was in the Senate, and he strikes a different ideological chord than other potential contenders that have been put forward as alternatives to Hillary Clinton, such as liberal stalwarts Howard Dean and Elizabeth Warren.
Political analysts seem to be using a 2008 template. That year, then-Sen. Barack Obama upset Clinton from the ideological left, going after her, for instance, on her Iraq War vote. But early polling suggests that a candidate fitting Webbs profile may be more likely to give Clinton (should she run) the stronger challenge in the 2016 Democratic primary.
....
Put it all together, and you start to get a picture of what a Clinton challenger might look like: probably male, moderate and anti-establishment.
Who matches that profile?
Webb, for one. He has been both a Democrat and Republican. Maybe Brian Schweitzer, the former Montana governor who mixes liberal and conservative positions and is not a fan of the Washington, D.C., establishment. A candidate like Joe Biden, who has been in Washington for over 40 years probably not.
Meanwhile, more liberal candidates like Dean, Warren and independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont match the anti-establishment part of the equation. They may, however, be too liberal to take advantage of Clintons weakness among moderate and conservative voters.
538
Political analysts seem to be using a 2008 template. That year, then-Sen. Barack Obama upset Clinton from the ideological left, going after her, for instance, on her Iraq War vote. But early polling suggests that a candidate fitting Webbs profile may be more likely to give Clinton (should she run) the stronger challenge in the 2016 Democratic primary.
....
Put it all together, and you start to get a picture of what a Clinton challenger might look like: probably male, moderate and anti-establishment.
Who matches that profile?
Webb, for one. He has been both a Democrat and Republican. Maybe Brian Schweitzer, the former Montana governor who mixes liberal and conservative positions and is not a fan of the Washington, D.C., establishment. A candidate like Joe Biden, who has been in Washington for over 40 years probably not.
Meanwhile, more liberal candidates like Dean, Warren and independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont match the anti-establishment part of the equation. They may, however, be too liberal to take advantage of Clintons weakness among moderate and conservative voters.
538
A hell of lot more number crunching and polls at link that an excerpt does not do justice to.
23 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I love how Dean gets to sidestep all of the 'third way' nonsense thrown around here
bigtree
May 2014
#1
No. As per custom - articles one reads that you think should be discussed here are posted.
Capt. Obvious
May 2014
#4
I think there is a galvanizing issue -- It's just a matter of packaging it correctly
Armstead
May 2014
#16
IMO we're a country in which elections have generally been very close and up for grabs
Armstead
May 2014
#20