General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What is 'misandry'? [View all]Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)I wasn't the one who brought up Warren Farrell in the first place. You seem to rant about him obsessively and if I dare make one comment correcting your obvious misrepresentations, you have a cow and stalk me endlessly about it for years accusing me of "defending" just because I make a bullshit call. Then you interject said misrepresentations in situations which have absolutely not one iota of relevance all the while actually having the gal to act as if I'm the one stalking you.
And what exactly do every single one of your accusations about Farrell (or me for that matter) amount to? Turns out, pretty much a bucket of warm spit. Anyone who cares to set their wiki to Farrell will find absolutely none of the allegations you've made about him, and it's not as if others who are better than you haven't tried to put them there. You can view the wiki history page and see that once one iota of reason and accountability are injected, those accusations fall like the house of cards they always were. In fact, no-shit real anti-feminists like Phyllis Schlafly are critical of Farrell which can also be found right on the wiki page.
I do agree with you completely here. Mine and your posts do speak for themselves, and anyone who cares to look can find out that really the best you have is misrepresenting other people's viewpoint for what can only be imagined as some game to score rhetorical points. And when your actual comments are laid out in context, without misrepresentation, you just pretend they never happened rather than apologizing to those you've hurt.