General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The vast majority of DU supports Snowden's and Greenwald's actions [View all]JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)metadata?
If so, why?
I'm asking you these questions because I think you are when all is said and done a pretty intelligent person and I don't understand how you can agree with the NSA surveillance.
I'd like to lift the discussion beyond the three-year-old level. I really don't understand why people think it's OK for the government to grab all our metadata. As I have said, I used to work for the phone company. I've seen metadata. I've seen how it can be used in civil and criminal law. The Maryland case dealt with a very specific instance in which metadata was obtained from a phone company to help solve a specific crime. I don't understand how you can think it is OK for the government to grab so much, such a vast amount of data, analyze it, group it and study the networking of millions of Americans. Why would they want to do that? I can think of only one reason: to understand and acquire ways to control political dissidents. Not terrorists. Just dissidents. People with new or different political ideas.
If they were on the lookout for terrorists, they could get warrants. They are looking for broad groupings of people, not for small terrorist cells. Terrorism is not commonplace in the US. Americans are not in rebellion.
For small terrorist groups, they could get warrants.
Please explain your view. Why do you think the government wants and should have our metadata? Do you think the government is collecting the content of our calls, e-mails, etc.?
Why are they spending so much money on electronic surveillance of Americans? It does not prevent the mass shootings. It doesn't help law enforcement. We are already checked out when we get into a plane. Why is this being done?