Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Onion’s Tips For Passing Gun Control Legislation [View all]Orrex
(67,163 posts)47. I like that.
Any crime committed with a stolen or unregistered firearm will carry a mandatory 20 year sentence in addition to sentencing for the crime itself.
I'm not sure why you would limit this to stolen or unregistered. I mean, if someone decides to rob a store, and they have a licensed gun, that's no worse than having an unregistered one. There is nobody on either side of the political fence that will object to this, and possession of a firearm while committing a crime carries enhanced penalties in most states.
Of course, by crimes, I assume you mean drug crimes as well, like marijuana users who are busted at home and have a hunting rifle in a safe?
By "hunting rifle," I assume you mean a licensed and registered firearm purchased legally? Further, I stipulated "any crime committed with a stolen or unregistered firearm," and I don't believe that smoking pot overlaps with that unless they're using the rifle barrel as a bong. In short, unless the unregistered firearm is integral to the crime committed, I don't think it's relevant. The registered hunting rifle might be found in the safe while executing a subsequent search warrant, but that's still different from committing the crime of smoking pot with a stolen or unregistered firearm.
If we decide that #1 does not warrant a penalty (which it shouldn't), then maybe we should just enforce the existing penalty (multiple years of jail time) for felons who attempt to purchase guns and commit perjury on the form? In 2010, the last year for which I can easily google statistics, there were 34,000 people who were either convicted felons or facing felony indictments who committed perjury when filling out a form applying for a NICS check. The DoJ prosecuted exactly 44 of them.
Sounds good to me. Lock 'em up. Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think every fucking asshat open carrying in a fast food joint is potentially dangerous
Skittles
May 2014
#25
Responsible gun owners can do a background check now using an FFL, but they won't.
Hoyt
May 2014
#26
First, your next door neighbor could check to see if you've done something in your past to
Hoyt
May 2014
#64
There is a point of agreement between the NRA and those who want more restrictions
aikoaiko
May 2014
#58
Good advice. Now, let's pass some sensible UK style gun control that will save lives. N.T.
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2014
#59
We need a REAL Opposition Party. One that ISN'T beholden to the 1% that owns Washington DC!!
blkmusclmachine
May 2014
#30
Why s it that one of the only places we find reason & rationality is from our humorists?
baldguy
May 2014
#31
Actually, it's a myth that Dems lost to the gun issues during the Clinton Years....
Spitfire of ATJ
May 2014
#65
he wanted the Dems to shift to the right so OF COURSE he blamed Liberal stands for the loss....
Spitfire of ATJ
May 2014
#69