Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
13. Agreed.
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 06:54 AM
Apr 2012

I fear the continued leaking of evidence is doing more damage to the prosecution's case than the defense, and not because it doesn't make it increasingly clear the Zimmerman was the aggressor from the start.

It may render more evidence unusable in court and make it harder to find a jury. Plus they tip off the defense as to where the prosecution is headed.

This may be a deliberate strategy on the part of the defense. First, try to spin it to see if it will all go away, using 3rd party "hearsay" that isn't usable in court. Failing that, keep pushing the opposition to show their hand too early.

We don't need to see any more leaked evidence in advance. Keep up the pressure, yes. But don't give away the case before trial. That's where the biggest danger lies, imo.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thank you for your sanity. CAPHAVOC Mar 2012 #1
Oh I think Zimmerman is guilty of manslaughter. I think he was having fantasies. I think he wanted applegrove Mar 2012 #2
Thank you, Applegrove. I agree that give an idiot enough rope and he'll hang himself. Ecumenist Mar 2012 #3
I doubt anything they say on tv can be used in a court of law. It is all just hearsay. robinlynne Mar 2012 #4
No, it isn't 'hearsay' if it's used to impeach COLGATE4 Apr 2012 #18
HE is not saying a word. He has a lawyer. the father and brother adn "friend" can say whatever they robinlynne Apr 2012 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author COLGATE4 Apr 2012 #21
Robinlynne. I apologize - I incorrectly read your COLGATE4 Apr 2012 #22
the pattern I see CatWoman Mar 2012 #6
I have posted time and time again about how their stories keep mutating to fit what the latest Ecumenist Mar 2012 #8
Actually, it is pretty certain in this case that Zimmerman killed JDPriestly Apr 2012 #10
Unfortunately CAPHAVOC Apr 2012 #12
I think he stepped down because he thought it would bring some "breathing room"... Amerigo Vespucci Mar 2012 #5
People expected him to quit on that day he just stepped down. Powers that be would only applegrove Mar 2012 #7
The ony person who can fire him is the city manager Norton Bonaparte who is black. snagglepuss Mar 2012 #9
seesm to me he would need to build a case first. you can't just fire the chief of police. robinlynne Apr 2012 #23
Zimmy wont be changing his story. HooptieWagon Apr 2012 #11
Agreed. magical thyme Apr 2012 #13
Well, before the triall the prosecution has to give the defense all the evidence they have HooptieWagon Apr 2012 #14
my idea is is that the defense is forcing the prosecution's hand early magical thyme Apr 2012 #16
I think he stepped down so that his boss, who just happens to be black, would take over slackmaster Apr 2012 #15
That makes sense too. applegrove Apr 2012 #19
Isn't the entire SFD under federal investigation right now? magical thyme Apr 2012 #17
Bill Lee stepped down because he was caught LYING - Big Time.... Junkdrawer Apr 2012 #24
Did not know he lied. We shall soon find out though. applegrove Apr 2012 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I think the fact that the...»Reply #13