General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We're really swimming in it now. [View all]KansDem
(28,498 posts)And when you do have a discussion and find you're "winning" due to facts and logic, the "faith-based debater" pulls out the ol' "We can agree to disagree" conclusion, effectively shutting down the discussion.
For example, I had an "discussion" with my sister last year. She is vehemently "anti-union" and believes "If The Man is signing your paycheck, you do what The Man says." To illustrate the need for unions, I brought up the Massey Mine disaster and asked her if there had been a union to put pressure on the company to follow safety regulations, would 25 miners have died? If a union had threatened to strike if safety issues weren't addressed by management, would the owners have ignored the problems? We went back and forth a few times until she pulled out the "Well, we can agree to disagree" excuse.
No, Sis...we can't "agree to disagree" when you refuse to recognize logic and facts.
I don't talk much with my Sis these days...