General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "The hard left"... you know what is so damn comical about this statement? [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)It takes a lot of money and clout and person power to win and keep a Senate seat, the kind that typically comes from having one of the two largest political parties and their employees and volunteers behind you, and their popular pols like Bubba or Obama campaigning for you when the going gets really tough for you.
When Sanders ran for Mayor of Burlington, Vt., he had no party behind him, yet he kept winning .At one point, the Democrats and Republicans were both so determined to oust him that they both backed a single candidate against him. (Sadly, not the only time something like that has happened.) And he won against both massive machines anyway.
Then, he got to the House. But a Senate seat is tougher than a House seat--and he won that, too. But, fundraising and fighting both parties all your career ain't easy, especially if you are over sixty. In any event, Bernie has made a bargain with Democrats: He votes with them on procedural matters and they don't run anyone against him in Vermont. So says wiki, anyway.
Is that all that is to the deal? I don't know. Probably all. But, I do know that I don't really hear Bernie criticizing both sides a lot. He confines his negative remarks to Republicans, even though I know he has to be seeing faults with both sides. So, I don't know how independent he really is, or how really independent he can be if he wants to keep his Senate seat.
Does that reflect his innermost thoughts? I don't know that either. How could I? Maybe his ideology has changed as he aged. That often happens. Maybe he's just tired of fighting them both. Who can know?