General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "The hard left"... you know what is so damn comical about this statement? [View all]MisterP
(23,730 posts)even to the point of deliberately allowing their own party to lose (of course a conservative Dem leader would rather work with the GOP than a Dem who'd even fight their own party to get things done, no matter how good those things are)
party leaders say it's just voter preference, but it's really a dedocracia--"rule by finger" where a candidate is favored/nominated, or an extant member promoted within the party or legislature
it's quite easy if you think about the Dems as a party with structures and factions, and not some army of 100M Paladins fighting the Debbil for a better world
Cegelis, Lamont, McKinney, Halter, Romanoff, Sestak, Grayson, Kucinich, Barbara Buono, Rev. Manuel Sykes, Wendy Davis weren't/aren't tanked or redistricted away because the DNCC thought they'd do worse against the Pub than their darling!
the past is important: people go to war over it, bleed it out their bodies: hence Orwell's Memory Holes to keep people entirely in the present, undermining their sense of roots or even ability to look backwards instead of downwards