Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In Norfolk, evidence of climate change is in the streets at high tide [View all]janlyn
(735 posts)5. I have to wonder
how long before a ban is put on climatologists and meteorologists from speaking to media about climate change as they have done in Canada?
Because everyone knows that if you quit talking about it it will go away!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In addition, controlling just one foot would cost $1 billion, which is more than the city budget
hatrack
Jun 2014
#47
Oh, don't worry. North Carolina has a really really good law to deal with this ---
progree
Jun 2014
#7
She probably let it become law because the Know-Nothings had enough votes to override. n/t
SwankyXomb
Jun 2014
#28
Why not veto it anyway? For the record. Dems should stand up for what they believe n/t
progree
Jun 2014
#30
If allowed to stand this law will guarantee that some public investment in infrastructure
KurtNYC
Jun 2014
#55
Apparently Helen Borg could not be bothered to read the rest of the article. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2014
#27
Because another effect of global warming is the slowing down of the Gulf Stream
Uncle Joe
Jun 2014
#61