Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Quixote1818

(31,148 posts)
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 01:46 PM Apr 2012

Isn't the writer of a law the ultimate authority and final say in its interpretation? [View all]


Meaning, since the writer of the stand your ground law said his law doesn't apply in the Trayvon Martin case, then I would think his opinion should be final. We often look to letters and the words of the Founding Fathers to interpret what they intended in the laws they wrote but in this case we have the author of the law saying clearly it does NOT have any bearing on this case other than perhaps Trayvon had the right to stand his ground by someone who was stalking him.

If I was a lawyer for the Martin family I point that out a thousand times during the case.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Isn't the writer of a law...