K&R if you think Zimmerman is guilty of murder

[truthseeker68]

62. Blinders on much?

Last edited Sun Apr 1, 2012, 03:51 PM - Edit history (1)

I don't know if Zimmerman is guilty or not in this tragedy. I think it will come down to whose voice is determined to be screaming for help for 40 seconds on the 911 tape. If its Martin"s then Zimmerman's story falls apart and his goose is cooked. But to say there is zero evidence backing his story shows you must have blinders on or watch NBC. Evidence such as:
1) The police report states Zimmerman was bleeding from his nose and the back of his head and had grass stains on his back. That report is evidence which backs Zimmerman's story.
2) The only eye witness that I know of that actually saw at least part of the fight says that Martin was on top pummeling Zimmerman below him and that Zimmerman was the one screaming for help. That eye witness testimony is evidence that backs Zimmerman's story.
3)Zimmerman's neighbor says that Zimmerman had bandages and swelling on his face in the days following the killing. His testimony will be evidence supporting Zimmerman's story
4) Although Zimmerman's history may suggest he could have violent tendencies so does Martin's as evidenced by his school troubles and his Twitter and Facebook accounts. His twitters degradingly referring to women as "bitches and ho's", his posts such as "Plzz shoot da #mf dat lied 2u!", and his twitter name "No_ Limit_ Nigga, could, if verified to be actually his, be evidence backing Zimmermans story that when he asked Martin what he was doing there, Martin responded by punching him in the face , knocking him to the gound, and pummeling him, by showing that Martin could have developed the thug or "gansta" mentality that has been so destructive to the lives of young black men in this country.

Your comment that the lies just keep piling up is certainly true. NBC was caught red handed doctoring the 911 call to lead their audience to believe that Zimmerman was racially profiling Martin. NBC's doctored version:

Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. He looks black.

The actual conversation:

Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. Or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.
Dispatcher: OK, and this guy — is he black, white or Hispanic?
Zimmerman: He looks black.

So instead of NBC's version that icould lead their viewers to think that Zimmerman thought Martin was up to no good because he was black, the actual recording shows that the reason he stated Martin's race is because he was asked by the dispatcher. NBC says they have launched an internal investigation.

The so called "Smoking Gun" ABC police station video ABC decided to show was of low resolution and ABC proclaimed no injuries were evident. But the Sanford police dept. has much higher resolution videos on which it appears you can see injuries to Zimmernan's head.
Why did ABC choose to show the low res version and why did they cover up Zimmerman's head with a breaking news banner when the whole point of the video was to see if he had injuries? High res. version can be found at the link below.

All of the evidence I've presented could be wrong or fabricated. The responding officer, medics, Zimmerman, eye witness, and neighbor, could all be engaging in a conspiracy by concocting a story that Zimmerman sustained injuries that are not evident on the low res. video ABC chose to show. I tend to doubt it.

I used to wonder how in the world supposedly normal humans could in the last century be ginned up through hatred into a mob mentality to lynch or convict blacks while totally ignoring any exculpatory facts or evidence.

I see that mindset in your "zero evidence" post






http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fsanfordfl.gov%2Finvestigation%2Ftrayvon_martin.html&h=yAQHJLWZ6