Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In Norfolk, evidence of climate change is in the streets at high tide [View all]SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)28. She probably let it become law because the Know-Nothings had enough votes to override. n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In addition, controlling just one foot would cost $1 billion, which is more than the city budget
hatrack
Jun 2014
#47
Oh, don't worry. North Carolina has a really really good law to deal with this ---
progree
Jun 2014
#7
She probably let it become law because the Know-Nothings had enough votes to override. n/t
SwankyXomb
Jun 2014
#28
Why not veto it anyway? For the record. Dems should stand up for what they believe n/t
progree
Jun 2014
#30
If allowed to stand this law will guarantee that some public investment in infrastructure
KurtNYC
Jun 2014
#55
Apparently Helen Borg could not be bothered to read the rest of the article. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2014
#27
Because another effect of global warming is the slowing down of the Gulf Stream
Uncle Joe
Jun 2014
#61