Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

jpgray

(27,831 posts)
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 04:44 PM Apr 2012

Questions for supporters of the individual mandate [View all]

Which regulatory triumphs over business in recent years give you the most confidence that the creation of a captive market will not be exploited?

Are there important differences between mandating the purchase of health insurance and ensuring that all Americans receive reasonable and necessary care? Do those currently insured always receive such care?

When you think of the cartel-like ascendancy and price-gouging of the pharmaceutical industry, the most profitable industry in the US year after year, a chief driver of our higher medical expenses versus the rest of the world - when you see this industry protected against not only regulation and negotiation but free-market re-importation, against all possible harm in other words from both ends of ideology, why do you believe the mandate is in our best interests or will be competently managed?

Is it possible to distrust the mandate but value unvarnished great aspects of the bill, such as removing gender discrimination or requiring coverage for those with preexisting conditions?

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Du rec. Nt xchrom Apr 2012 #1
I was informed that Obamacare is also regulating the ins. industry to make them more trustworthy. KG Apr 2012 #2
Yes ProSense Apr 2012 #3
The idea isn't to spruce up the hole, but to climb out of it jpgray Apr 2012 #4
And ProSense Apr 2012 #5
There are good things in the bill it would be a shame to lose jpgray Apr 2012 #6
First ProSense Apr 2012 #8
K&R EFerrari Apr 2012 #7
requiring coverage for those with preexisting conditions justgamma Apr 2012 #9
I'm counting on it to be exploited. jeff47 Apr 2012 #10
This is already happening Major Nikon Apr 2012 #14
Precisely. The more pressure it is to cause rates to go up the quicker a public... joshcryer Apr 2012 #18
The mandate was the only option........ Swede Atlanta Apr 2012 #11
I find the argument over the individual mandate pretty disingenuous Major Nikon Apr 2012 #16
The left opposes the mandate for many reasons. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #21
Then they should be opposing the privatization of taxation Major Nikon Apr 2012 #23
Baucus's office. And his senior aide Liz Fowler was formerly a VP at Wellpoint. EFerrari Apr 2012 #25
The bill originated in Rangels office Major Nikon Apr 2012 #26
You're right, I forgot about the House bill. EFerrari Apr 2012 #27
It certainly happens Major Nikon Apr 2012 #28
Why wasn't single payer pushed as a Medicare expansion? jpgray Apr 2012 #17
How many people campaigned on single payer? joshcryer Apr 2012 #20
I hate to see people knuckle under to Republican ideas as our "only option" n/t OccupyTheIRS Apr 2012 #12
K&R idwiyo Apr 2012 #13
IANA and the baby Bells both come to mind Recursion Apr 2012 #15
We had this discussion in 2007. joshcryer Apr 2012 #19
Point by point - bhikkhu Apr 2012 #22
What's the possibility of throwing a medicaid buy in after this is passed? Incitatus Apr 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Questions for supporters ...