Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I was never crazy about Greenwald, and don't care for Snowden. But some of you make me a fanboy [View all]"Do you believe there should be limits on how intrusive government spying is?"
...people who oppose NSA overreach and recognize the value of the debate also don't approve of Snowden's actions that go beyond sparking a debate about the NSA's domestic activities. Snowden's problem is that he knows damn well he screwed up with his actions overseas. This goes to his motives, and likely why he fled.
Maybe there is a reason you don't "trust" him.
Jimmy Carter:
Carter: Snowden's leaks 'good for Americans to know'
Susan Page
NEW YORK -- Former president Jimmy Carter defended the disclosures by fugitive NSA contractor Edward Snowden on Monday, saying revelations that U.S. intelligence agencies were collecting meta-data of Americans' phone calls and e-mails have been "probably constructive in the long run."
<...>
Does he view Snowden, now granted asylum in Russia, as a hero or a traitor?
"There's no doubt that he broke the law and that he would be susceptible, in my opinion, to prosecution if he came back here under the law," he said. "But I think it's good for Americans to know the kinds of things that have been revealed by him and others -- and that is that since 9/11 we've gone too far in intrusion on the privacy that Americans ought to enjoy as a right of citizenship."
Carter cautioned that he didn't have information about whether some of the disclosures "may have hurt our security or individuals that work in security," adding, "If I knew that, then I may feel differently." And he said Snowden shouldn't be immune from prosecution for his actions.
"I think it's inevitable that he should be prosecuted and I think he would be prosecuted" if he returned to the United States, the former president said. "But I don't think he ought to be executed as a traitor or any kind of extreme punishment like that."
- more -
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/03/24/usa-today-capital-download-jimmy-carter-edward-snowden-probably-constructive/6822425/
Susan Page
NEW YORK -- Former president Jimmy Carter defended the disclosures by fugitive NSA contractor Edward Snowden on Monday, saying revelations that U.S. intelligence agencies were collecting meta-data of Americans' phone calls and e-mails have been "probably constructive in the long run."
<...>
Does he view Snowden, now granted asylum in Russia, as a hero or a traitor?
"There's no doubt that he broke the law and that he would be susceptible, in my opinion, to prosecution if he came back here under the law," he said. "But I think it's good for Americans to know the kinds of things that have been revealed by him and others -- and that is that since 9/11 we've gone too far in intrusion on the privacy that Americans ought to enjoy as a right of citizenship."
Carter cautioned that he didn't have information about whether some of the disclosures "may have hurt our security or individuals that work in security," adding, "If I knew that, then I may feel differently." And he said Snowden shouldn't be immune from prosecution for his actions.
"I think it's inevitable that he should be prosecuted and I think he would be prosecuted" if he returned to the United States, the former president said. "But I don't think he ought to be executed as a traitor or any kind of extreme punishment like that."
- more -
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/03/24/usa-today-capital-download-jimmy-carter-edward-snowden-probably-constructive/6822425/
Bernie Sanders:
<...>
BLITZER: What about Snowden? Do you think that he committed a crime or he was simply a well-intentioned whistle-blower?
SANDERS: Well, I think what you have to look at is -- I think there is no question that he committed a crime, obviously. He violated his oath and he leaked information.
On the other hand, what you have to weigh that against is the fact that he has gone a very long way in educating the people of our country and the people of the world about the power of private agency in terms of their surveillance over people of this country, over foreign leaders, and what they are doing.
So, I think you got to weigh the two. My own belief is that I think, I would hope that the United States government could kind of negotiate some plea bargain with him, some form of clemency. I think it wouldn't be a good idea or fair to him to have to spend his entire remaining life abroad, not being able to come back to his country.
So I would hope that there's a price that he has to pay, but I hope it is not a long prison sentence or exile from his country.
BLITZER: You wouldn't give him clemency, though, and let him off scot-free?
SANDERS: No. BLITZER: All right, Senator, thanks very much for joining us.
<...>
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1401/06/sitroom.02.html
BLITZER: What about Snowden? Do you think that he committed a crime or he was simply a well-intentioned whistle-blower?
SANDERS: Well, I think what you have to look at is -- I think there is no question that he committed a crime, obviously. He violated his oath and he leaked information.
On the other hand, what you have to weigh that against is the fact that he has gone a very long way in educating the people of our country and the people of the world about the power of private agency in terms of their surveillance over people of this country, over foreign leaders, and what they are doing.
So, I think you got to weigh the two. My own belief is that I think, I would hope that the United States government could kind of negotiate some plea bargain with him, some form of clemency. I think it wouldn't be a good idea or fair to him to have to spend his entire remaining life abroad, not being able to come back to his country.
So I would hope that there's a price that he has to pay, but I hope it is not a long prison sentence or exile from his country.
BLITZER: You wouldn't give him clemency, though, and let him off scot-free?
SANDERS: No. BLITZER: All right, Senator, thanks very much for joining us.
<...>
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1401/06/sitroom.02.html
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024292659
I stand with anyone who recognizes that one doesn't have defend Snowden, Putin's tool, to be on the "right side of history."
Senator Blumenthal: prosecute Snowden, overhaul FISA courts.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023425884
Rep. John Lewis: "NO PRAISE FOR SNOWDEN-Reports about my interview with The Guardian are misleading"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023427908
What Mr. Snowden did is treason, was high crimes, and there is nothing in what we say that justifies what he did, said Richard Clarke, a former White House counter-terrorism advisor and current ABC News contributor. Whether or not this panel would have been created anyway, I dont know, but I dont think anything that Ive learned justifies the treasonous acts of Mr. Snowden.
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/white-house-nsa-panel-member-snowdens-leaks-treasonous/story?id=21277856
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/white-house-nsa-panel-member-snowdens-leaks-treasonous/story?id=21277856
From the beginning, it was clear that Snowden broke the law (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023439290). There was a point where even Snowden supporters accepted that he knew he broke the law. Snowden said it himself.
Fleeing the country and releasing state secrets did not help his case.
His actions since then have only made the situation worse.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023035550
Former Counterterrorism Czar Richard Clarke: Snowden Should Be In Prison. NSA did nothing wrong.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025023981
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
237 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I was never crazy about Greenwald, and don't care for Snowden. But some of you make me a fanboy [View all]
Armstead
Jun 2014
OP
You really don't understand, I thought you were just being facetious. You didn't wonder why the more
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#133
You all? I have never personally attacked people critical of Greenwald or Snowden.
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#136
Good post, and it WAS a 'whole different story' when the spying was exposed when Bush occupied the
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#188
Is it an insult to fellow members of DU to refer to them as paid government shills?
Cali_Democrat
Jun 2014
#143
Well I don't really keep track of recs, but I've seen your posts in the past and I assumed you rec'd
Cali_Democrat
Jun 2014
#148
I won't waste any more time. I am glad you aren't keeping a list of who recs what
Mojorabbit
Jun 2014
#151
That's generally the end result of campaigns against people that are so nasty and mean spirited,
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#18
I know, I completely understand your point. My comment was directed to Cali Dem though, trying to
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#34
+1. When they launch into a litany of "traitor, narcissist, comrade Eddie, punk etc" I just turn off
riderinthestorm
Jun 2014
#35
The use of the McCarthy era vitriol which was specifically aimed at the Left, removes all
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#48
In 2007-08, I defended Obama on another board vigorously and continually. The board owner was
merrily
Jun 2014
#226
I read it that the poster was standing AGAINST something. Mean spirited, personal attacks are never
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#22
Are you talking about DUers who have blue link specials on DUers being gov't spies?
Whisp
Jun 2014
#21
The difference is that propaganda is based in loyalty, not policies and principles.
woo me with science
Jun 2014
#68
I agree. I don't need to like the guys to be disgusted that my government is spying on me.
Squinch
Jun 2014
#20
Bingo. The more anyone makes it about Snowden and Greenwald, the less it becomes about the actions
merrily
Jun 2014
#223
So don't do any spying because it's possible you might inadvertently see an American?
randome
Jun 2014
#84
We're talking about the NSA monitoring foreign suspects, not American citizens.
randome
Jun 2014
#94
Apparently they don't 'monitor foreign suspects'. If they did they might have prevented the
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#138
Exactly right, this point is ever ignored (even by folks on the side of our most basic rights)
TheKentuckian
Jun 2014
#237
I see at least two major problems with the FISA Court as my post above states.
Uncle Joe
Jun 2014
#92
Reform the hell out of it. Too bad Snowden had nothing to say about this until recently.
randome
Jun 2014
#96
PRISM, FISA Court it's all part of the same too secret for the public, Big Brother all knowing
Uncle Joe
Jun 2014
#106
Are you saying that the FISA courts were created during the Bush Adminstration?
merrily
Jun 2014
#225
Thanks, I appreciate your post. I actually *was* a fan of Greenwald, way back in the day.
scarletwoman
Jun 2014
#62
Very interesting post. That's partly how I got to where I am, I think.
woo me with science
Jun 2014
#100
It's The Boomerang Effect... The Person That Throws It... Doesn't Get Why Their Head Hurts...
WillyT
Jun 2014
#104
odd that the Transparency is a "punishment" meted out to posters when they are 'bad'
bobduca
Jun 2014
#176
It comes from the same ones who take criticisms of the President personally.
morningfog
Jun 2014
#110
The really hilarious thing about the anti-Greenwald, anti-Snowden crowd?
Spider Jerusalem
Jun 2014
#112
Amen. It's politics as a team sport, not as doing what's best for the country.
beerandjesus
Jun 2014
#180
Yes, I'm very angry about Benghazi and the IRS....This is just the same as those NOT
Armstead
Jun 2014
#159
I'm just pointing out that you can dislike them as a person & still disagree w/ surveillance policy
davidpdx
Jun 2014
#168
But, you don't understand. Ellsberg (Pentagon Papers) has respect here because
LiberalArkie
Jun 2014
#181
That's about how I feel as well, but I'd add that the homphobia laced attacks on Greenwald
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2014
#206