Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ProSense

(116,464 posts)

3. Yes

Reply to jpgray (Original post)

Sun Apr 1, 2012, 05:15 PM

Apr 2012

"Is it possible to distrust the mandate but value unvarnished great aspects of the bill, such as removing gender discrimination or requiring coverage for those with preexisting conditions?"

...it is possible to "distrust the mandate" and value the "great aspects of the bill."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002495048

Unfortunately, there are those who would rather see the bill killed instead of upholding the mandate. That would make millions of low-income Americans no longer be eligible for Medicaid (http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002496395) and all the other good things the law does.

Krugman: "Health reform doesn’t work without a mandate" (2011)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002503913

Remember, Krugman declared:

"Guys, this is a major program to aid lower- and lower-middle-income families. How is that not a big progressive victory?"

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/26/numerical-notes-on-health-care-reform/

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Questions for supporters of the individual mandate [View all] jpgray Apr 2012 OP

Du rec. Nt xchrom Apr 2012 #1

I was informed that Obamacare is also regulating the ins. industry to make them more trustworthy. KG Apr 2012 #2

Yes ProSense Apr 2012 #3

The idea isn't to spruce up the hole, but to climb out of it jpgray Apr 2012 #4

And ProSense Apr 2012 #5

There are good things in the bill it would be a shame to lose jpgray Apr 2012 #6

First ProSense Apr 2012 #8

K&R EFerrari Apr 2012 #7

requiring coverage for those with preexisting conditions justgamma Apr 2012 #9

I'm counting on it to be exploited. jeff47 Apr 2012 #10

This is already happening Major Nikon Apr 2012 #14

Precisely. The more pressure it is to cause rates to go up the quicker a public... joshcryer Apr 2012 #18

The mandate was the only option........ Swede Atlanta Apr 2012 #11

I find the argument over the individual mandate pretty disingenuous Major Nikon Apr 2012 #16

The left opposes the mandate for many reasons. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #21

Then they should be opposing the privatization of taxation Major Nikon Apr 2012 #23

Baucus's office. And his senior aide Liz Fowler was formerly a VP at Wellpoint. EFerrari Apr 2012 #25

The bill originated in Rangels office Major Nikon Apr 2012 #26

You're right, I forgot about the House bill. EFerrari Apr 2012 #27

It certainly happens Major Nikon Apr 2012 #28

Why wasn't single payer pushed as a Medicare expansion? jpgray Apr 2012 #17

How many people campaigned on single payer? joshcryer Apr 2012 #20

I hate to see people knuckle under to Republican ideas as our "only option" n/t OccupyTheIRS Apr 2012 #12

K&R idwiyo Apr 2012 #13

IANA and the baby Bells both come to mind Recursion Apr 2012 #15

We had this discussion in 2007. joshcryer Apr 2012 #19

Point by point - bhikkhu Apr 2012 #22

What's the possibility of throwing a medicaid buy in after this is passed? Incitatus Apr 2012 #24