Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Glenn Greenwald ain't no Libertarian, Part 1: Defending Social Security and Medicare [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)4. "the best candidate for any office."
But what makes the media most eager to disappear Paul is that he destroys the easy, conventional narrative for slothful media figures and for Democratic loyalists alike. Aside from the truly disappeared former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson (more on him in a moment), Ron Paul is far and away the most anti-war, anti-Surveillance-State, anti-crony-capitalism, and anti-drug-war presidential candidate in either party. How can the conventional narrative of extremist/nationalistic/corporatist/racist/warmongering GOP v. the progressive/peaceful/anti-corporate/poor-and-minority-defending Democratic Party be reconciled with the fact that a candidate with those positions just virtually tied for first place among GOP base voters in Iowa? Not easily, and Paul is thus disappeared from existence. That the similarly anti-war, pro-civil-liberties, anti-drug-war Gary Johnson is not even allowed in media debates despite being a twice-elected popular governor highlights the same dynamic.
http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/elections_9/
http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/elections_9/
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024931733#post164
The OP commentary is a trip. It's Greenwald moving from his election speculation FAIL to his Social Security speculation fail. IOW, he wasn't defending it, he was using it as part of his anti-Obama talking points. Greenwald:
STEP SIX: Once the deal is enacted with bipartisan support and Obama signs it in a ceremony, standing in front of his new Treasury Secretary, the supreme corporatist Erskine Bowles, where he touts the virtues of bipartisanship and making "tough choices", any progressives still complaining will be told that it is time to move on. Any who do not will be constantly reminded that there is an Extremely Important Election coming the 2014 midterm where it will be Absolutely Vital that Democrats hold onto the Senate and that they take over the House. Any progressive, still infuriated by cuts to social security and Medicare, who still refuses to get meekly in line behind the Party will be told that they are jeopardizing the Party's chances for winning that Vital Election and as a result of their opposition - are helping Mitch McConnell take over control of the Senate and John Boehner retain control of the House.
FAIL LOL!
h/t Cha and Tarheel_Dem
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
243 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Glenn Greenwald ain't no Libertarian, Part 1: Defending Social Security and Medicare [View all]
MannyGoldstein
Jun 2014
OP
Racist is what racist says and " it was my early days" (sic) != a changed mind
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#123
Explain why Libertarin Greenwald consistently attacks reporters covering the Koch cartel
kfreed
Aug 2014
#235
"If you don't like someone criticizing your Beloved Leader, you could always move to North Korea."
Number23
Jun 2014
#29
Clue: Australian Wikileaks Party (Assange) preferences fascists, mens righters, and gun humpers...
kfreed
Aug 2014
#237
Let's not forget the Three Libertarians tour he took.with Bruce Fein right before
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#93
Damn, Ma'am: I Knew The Fella Had Problems, But What Is At that Link Is Way Over The Top
The Magistrate
Aug 2014
#242
I don't see anything about Greenwald laughing at a joke about Obama raping a nun
MannyGoldstein
Aug 2014
#243
I found it rich that Greenwald trashed Sen. Warren during her tough campaign against Scott Brown.
MADem
Jun 2014
#173
Apparently, the man doesn't get to define himself when DU's clairvoyances' are on the hunt!Tally ho!
Luminous Animal
Jun 2014
#13
Damn good find Whisp. Lot of egg on quite a few faces. Anonymous, Sibel Edmonds,
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2014
#70
The statement that Ron Paul was an anti-war candidate was, in fact, accurate.
Jim Lane
Jun 2014
#172
Nope, they have their opinion and their conclusions on the racist bastard is wrong
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#124
long string of site disruptions, takeovers, shut downs when things get too liberal elsewhere
reddread
Jun 2014
#73
I think one of them is. And I'm not throwing any Godwin at you when I say that, either.
MADem
Jun 2014
#174
Let's scrutinize: "THE RIGHT HAND OF OCCUPY WALL STREET: FROM LIBERTARIANS TO NAZIS..."
kfreed
Aug 2014
#240
Option 3 holds sway. Now, do you have what it takes to withdraw your claims?
DisgustipatedinCA
Jun 2014
#113
He used it as a compliment: "the crown legislative jewels of American liberalism"
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2014
#138
You're wrong, if you think Greenwald, or Manny, are in that 'they' you've conjured up
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2014
#204
We have audio from Democracy Now from a week later, so you can literally hear
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2014
#206
He takes paychecks from Koch and Omidyar, and specializes in "from the left" attacks.
MADem
Jun 2014
#214
I don't think that's the problem, really. We all know the original meaning of the term.
MADem
Jun 2014
#220
But Greenwald is not a GOP supporter, and you've *heard* him say the word
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2014
#228
Libertarian and Reagan Welfare Queen Republican--it's one of Frank Luntz's favorite digs.
MADem
Jun 2014
#195
Ha ha ha ha!!!!!!!! I provided you with three links. I proved what I was saying.
MADem
Jun 2014
#212
Sophistry, no mention of social security... Most GG support is packed with sophistry
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#125
What else is an "entitlement" and when did Obama offer to cut any of them?
MannyGoldstein
Jun 2014
#128
no mention of social security in that statement no matter what pretzel logic is used...
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#150
the false equivalency of "Libertarian" and "libertarian" turns the ACLU into Ayn Rand groupies
carolinayellowdog
Jun 2014
#98
Why is it that Greenwald does his defending by criticising Obama and Democrats but not Republicans??
DCBob
Jun 2014
#163
Not in the least. I criticize Democrats more than Republicans because I hold Democrats
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#167
Yeah why be against cuts when they're floated/proposed? I mean, why fight to stop the cuts?
neverforget
Jun 2014
#184
And let's not forget to thank Greenwald for singlehandedly turning back the invaders from Mars!
struggle4progress
Jun 2014
#188