Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are you a Socialist? [View all]Armstead
(47,803 posts)12. Balance
I'd take either one in their pure form if it contained checks and balances to make sure it actually does do the reatest good for the greatest number of people.
Unfortunately, both systems are subject to human error and human greed and lust for more,more,more.
So I guess that makes me a liberal in the sense I understand it. Which is that we have a capitalistic system, and what we need to do is do everything possible to make sure it is balanced off by enough socialism to regulate it and protect the social safety net and also maintains a strong orientation towards "the commons" and public interest.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In the absence of another definition, here's an encyclopedia article:
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2014
#2
Democratic socialism is also a form of socialism, a blend of regulated capitalism and
tblue37
Jun 2014
#26
You don't think allowing corporations to buy elections has anything to do with that?
Ohio Joe
Jun 2014
#47
Some fool at discussionist posted this thread as an example of DU being a "cesspool"
quinnox
Jun 2014
#31
well yes, Both Mao and Tony Blair called themselves Socialist - so obviously different people mean
Douglas Carpenter
Jun 2014
#32
I favor a much heavier portion of socialism in our mixed economy than we have now for sure.
TheKentuckian
Jun 2014
#39