Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Tenn. cotton gin boss caught on tape: We ‘hang’ blacks for drinking ‘white people only’ water [View all]1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)29. Yes. The supervisor's conduct is clearly wrong-doing ...
but the question goes to the liability of the employer and the affirmative defenses that are available.
In Ellerth and Faragher, the Supreme
Court, in setting forth the new employer liability rubric, attempted to
give definitive meaning to the term, announcing that a tangible
employment action is a significant change in employment status,
such as hiring, firing, failing to promote, reassignment with
significantly different responsibilities, or a decision causing a
significant change in benefits.41.
http://www.wcl.american.edu/journal/genderlaw/14/bradshaw2.pdf
Court, in setting forth the new employer liability rubric, attempted to
give definitive meaning to the term, announcing that a tangible
employment action is a significant change in employment status,
such as hiring, firing, failing to promote, reassignment with
significantly different responsibilities, or a decision causing a
significant change in benefits.41.
http://www.wcl.american.edu/journal/genderlaw/14/bradshaw2.pdf
Tragically, these two employees would have had a stronger (more winnable) case, if they had quit the job, as there would have been a clear adverse employment action ... But no attorney of good conscience would advise an employee to quit a job, on the hope of prevailing in court.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Tenn. cotton gin boss caught on tape: We ‘hang’ blacks for drinking ‘white people only’ water [View all]
DonViejo
Jun 2014
OP
Suing remains an option, however, mediation of this type might lead to a quicker and more
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#2
I say this an attorney--you may win in a courtroom, but what you win may not encompass all you need.
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#24
The U.S. is going backwards. Racism is more open and it's all around us, and teabaggers have been
AlinPA
Jun 2014
#28
Sure....if that's what the employees want. But maybe they want the problem fixed, and
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#43
Of course Roberts said that. Not once in his life did anyone show racism towards him.
Ikonoklast
Jun 2014
#12
Justice Roberts will be known as a judicial embarrassment by history books and the next generations
tomm2thumbs
Jun 2014
#26
They cannot sue until the EEOC finishes it's investigation and issues a "Right to sue" letter.
Dustlawyer
Jun 2014
#11
It's entirely possible that's already happened, and both sides decided on the EEOC ARD. nt
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#23