Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Stained frontman stops show after girl getting assaulted in crowd [View all]AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)68. It sounded to me like you were being sarcastic about the word.
It's clear that you were attempting to imply something else, and an archaic use of 'honor'.
But boy, that post really came across as blaming the victim, even if that's not how you intended it, and that is why the strong reaction.
Quite a number of posters reached the same conclusion I did when I read that first post.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've read that he's a Republican, and that the Teabaggers claim him as a favorite,
Heidi
Jun 2014
#18
Yep. that's why defenses of women often are phrased in terms of "someone's Mother,
BlancheSplanchnik
Jun 2014
#39
Indeed. No DUer should link to the Blaze on this site when tbe story is on other sites.
SunSeeker
Jun 2014
#16
WOW. Hard to make any comment on D.U. anymore w/o offending someone or having it
maddiemom
Jun 2014
#49
No, that definition was not my intention. If my post was read all the way through,
maddiemom
Jun 2014
#69
NOW, the three types of bullshit? I still don't understand why my quotes would imply "scary"
maddiemom
Jun 2014
#70
I replied to you an HOUR before you posted this question in the wrong place. #65
AtheistCrusader
Jun 2014
#75
PLEASE GO BACK AND READ VERY CAREFULLY. Where do I imply that I am offended by the language
maddiemom
Jun 2014
#50
For want of a better word (body? or person? or ???). And what doesn't sexual assault
maddiemom
Jun 2014
#52
No, no, no...you miss my point. "Vulgar" language IS a verbal assault. Even if you or
maddiemom
Jun 2014
#71
Did you READ and THINK about the whole post and make your judgement when finished?
maddiemom
Jun 2014
#72
You should probably not pre-judge how someone else should or should not have judged your post.
AtheistCrusader
Jun 2014
#74
Even mentioning Mr. Lewis's choice of language in this context strikes me as absurd, or worse.
nomorenomore08
Jun 2014
#84
You sound as if you "got" my comment in spirit in which it was intended. I hope...
maddiemom
Jun 2014
#64