Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Pierre Omidyar - Libertarian GG's Libertarian Billionaire Boss [View all]Whisp
(24,096 posts)28. Six Degrees of Omidyar
http://tomslee.net/2013/09/six-degrees-of-omidyar.html
Six Degrees of Omidyar
September 8, 2013
Start with an old story. Back in 2006 the world of microfinance split between pure do-gooders and profit-minded do-gooders, between Nobel Peace Prize winner Mohammed Yunus and eBay billionaire Pierre Omidyar. Yunuss Grameen Bank had pioneered group-based credit for the impoverished, but had stayed away from making the Bank into a public company; Omidyar wanted to turn microfinance into a fully commercial, profit-making sector.
---
Microfinance operates at the border between charity and business. LAPO was for several years a major partner of Omidyar-funded peer-to-peer lender Kiva, until Kiva cut ties in 2010. The episode highlighted a fact that was worrying some observers, including David Roodman: peer-to-peer lending is not actually peer-to-peer, instead Kiva works with intermediary partners which in turn make loans which were not, as many thought, interest-free.
[Update: a version of this post, re-edited in the light of the Omidyar/Greenwald news venture, is now at The New Inquiry: Charity Assets.]
http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/charity-assets/
Charity Assets
By Tom Slee
--
Change.org is one example of how adopting the Omidyar vision can boost enterprise at the cost of social, and has many parallels to the new journalism venture. The site has long presented itself as a non-profit organization (a .org), and has gained widespread support on that basis. But it was actually privately owned, and in 2012 it stepped out from behind its non-profit front, allowing corporate advertising, Republican Party solicitations, astroturf campaigns, anti-abortion or anti-union ads and other controversial sponsorships (insert fucking puke). Then in May 2013 it took venture capital from the Omidyar Network and others in order to scale up, and the nature of the organization changed.
The Omidyar/Change.org press release uses the standard language of social entrepreneurs: blandly inspirational and content-free.
Six Degrees of Omidyar
September 8, 2013
Start with an old story. Back in 2006 the world of microfinance split between pure do-gooders and profit-minded do-gooders, between Nobel Peace Prize winner Mohammed Yunus and eBay billionaire Pierre Omidyar. Yunuss Grameen Bank had pioneered group-based credit for the impoverished, but had stayed away from making the Bank into a public company; Omidyar wanted to turn microfinance into a fully commercial, profit-making sector.
---
Microfinance operates at the border between charity and business. LAPO was for several years a major partner of Omidyar-funded peer-to-peer lender Kiva, until Kiva cut ties in 2010. The episode highlighted a fact that was worrying some observers, including David Roodman: peer-to-peer lending is not actually peer-to-peer, instead Kiva works with intermediary partners which in turn make loans which were not, as many thought, interest-free.
[Update: a version of this post, re-edited in the light of the Omidyar/Greenwald news venture, is now at The New Inquiry: Charity Assets.]
http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/charity-assets/
Charity Assets
By Tom Slee
--
Change.org is one example of how adopting the Omidyar vision can boost enterprise at the cost of social, and has many parallels to the new journalism venture. The site has long presented itself as a non-profit organization (a .org), and has gained widespread support on that basis. But it was actually privately owned, and in 2012 it stepped out from behind its non-profit front, allowing corporate advertising, Republican Party solicitations, astroturf campaigns, anti-abortion or anti-union ads and other controversial sponsorships (insert fucking puke). Then in May 2013 it took venture capital from the Omidyar Network and others in order to scale up, and the nature of the organization changed.
The Omidyar/Change.org press release uses the standard language of social entrepreneurs: blandly inspirational and content-free.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Guy's not perfect, but he's one of the few billionaires interested in supporting democracy.
Octafish
Jun 2014
#3
eBay Shrugged: Pierre Omidyar believes there should be no philanthropy without profit
Whisp
Jun 2014
#4
Libertarians like Omidyar and Greenwald believe in completely unfettered free markets. nt
Cali_Democrat
Jun 2014
#23
Half of the article on DailyPaul that you linked to is from Infowars
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2014
#20
You may think Stormfront and infowars are okay to link to here now, but I don't
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2014
#43
GG and Co. give a shit about domestic spying. It's a ruse, it's bait for the gullible.
Whisp
Jun 2014
#29
No, I'm saying Omidyar and Co. are using people's fear for profit. Just like the NRA.
Whisp
Jun 2014
#32
I disagree wholeheartedly. I am seeing the same kinds of reactions from the groups.
Whisp
Jun 2014
#40
Ah. So all his experience in cyber security is null and void if he profits from it?
Cerridwen
Jun 2014
#44
Then the Vanity Fair article from 2004 will really make things tough for you.
Cerridwen
Jun 2014
#56
So if someone's boss isn't ideologically pure enough for anonymous internet dudes
riderinthestorm
Jun 2014
#34
There's a lot of distance between ideologically pure and filthy money grubbing ghoul. n/t
Whisp
Jun 2014
#38
Since when do "investors" in Kiva make anything from their "investments?"
Jackpine Radical
Jun 2014
#53