Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Make No Mistake, Risen Case Is a Direct Attack on the Press [View all]

Make No Mistake, This Case Is a Direct Attack on the Press
by Trevor Timm
Monday, June 2, 2014 by Freedom of the Press Foundation
The Supreme Court today rejected New York Times reporter James Risen's appeal of a 4th Circuit decision that ruled the government can compel him to reveal his source under oath. The case, one of the most important for reporter's privilege in decades, means that Risen has exhausted his appeals and must now either testify in the leak trial of former CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling, or face jail time for being in contempt of court. Risen has admirably vowed to go to prison rather than comply.
This is the latest victory of the Obama administration in their crackdown on sources, and in turn, investigative journalism. As the New York Times again reminded us today, they have "pursued leaks aggressively, bringing criminal charges in eight cases, compared with three under all previous administrations combined."
Make no mistake, this case is a direct attack on the press. The Justice Department has recently tightened its "guidelines" for subpoenaing reporters (which have no enforcement mechanism) and the Obama administration claims it supports a tepid journalist shield law, but this was the case where they could have shown they meant what they said about protecting journalists' rights. Instead, they argued to the court that reporter's privilege does not exist all.
By going after Risen, the Obama administration has done more damage to reporter's privilege than any other case in forty years, including the Valerie Plame leak investigation that ensnared Judy Miller during the Bush administration. The Fourth Circuit is where many national security reporters live and work, and by eviscerating the privilege there, the government has made national security reporting that much harder in an age where there has already been an explosion in use on surveillance to root out sources of journalists.
While the fight for reporter's privilege will certainly continue, and is by no means dead in much of the country, this case is another reminder that reporters can no longer rely on the legal process to protect their sources. Surveillance has become the government's go-to tool for rooting out a record number of sources and chilling all kinds of investigative journalism. [font color="purple"]Out of the eight source prosecutions under the Obama administration, the Sterling case is the only one where a reporter was called to testify. As an unnamed national security official reportedly once said a year ago, the Risen subpoena is one of the last youll see. We dont need to ask who youre talking to. We know.[/font color]
It's now incumbent upon reporters to use technology to help protect their sources from the first moment they start communicating with them. Encryptionwhether it's used with email, chat, or phone callsis now a vital tool that can no longer be looked at as a luxury or speciality. Whistleblower submission systems, like our SecureDrop project or Globaleaks, should become the norm rather than the exception.
Despite the damage its already done to reporter's privilege on the whole, the government can still prevent Risen from going to jail by declining to call him to testify in the Sterling trial. Since the Attorney General has repeatedly stated that no reporter will go to jail for doing his or her job, that seems like the least they can do.
As a small tribute to Risen, today is a fitting day to re-read the book chapter that the government has subpoenaed him over. He exposed a disasterous operation by the CIA, where they literally handed over designs to a nuclear bomb to Iran. It is a truly riveting read and the public is better served by knowing what happened.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Trevor Timm is a co-founder and the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation. He is a writer, activist, and legal analyst who specializes in free speech and government transparency issues. He writes a weekly column for The Guardian and has also contributed to The Atlantic, Al Jazeera, Foreign Policy, Harvard Law and Policy Review, PBS MediaShift, and Politico. Follow him on Twitter: @TrevorTimm
SOURCE w/links...
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/06/02-6
PS: Freedom of the press mattered to President Kennedy.
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When Judith Miller went to jail, it was Fitzmas. Now Risen faces the same charges,
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#1
More importantly: Why, after Bush dropped the matter, did Obama go after Risen?
Octafish
Jun 2014
#2
Bush dropped the matter? Kindly post the indictment of Sterling that predates the Obama
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#3
No--what it means is that the Bush DOJ already had one leak investigation going on, and
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#7
It originates in the ODS section of the federal code, where the President is completely to blame
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#13
As one of the site's identified paid shills (tm) I get paid piecework, not hourly.
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#16
The Plame affair was nonsense, in the sense the prosecutions did not go far enough. The Espionage
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#12
Borger's point seems not to be about secrecy, but about the idea that the CIA and FBI should
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#25
Sure--but Novak's dead, and Fitzgerald never could find evidence that Armitage knew of Plame's
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#38
Already done. On 6 March 2007 Libby was found guilty on four of the five counts against him.
ieoeja
Jun 2014
#39
How very old-fashioned of you Octafish! Didn't you know? That Bill of Rights, it's so 'quaint'
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#45
It's almost like there was some profound revelation made to him after inauguration
hootinholler
Jun 2014
#26
People say this but their is nothing possible much less plausible that changes anything
TheKentuckian
Jun 2014
#48
In a nation under law, there'd be no secret government, stay behind networks, Secret Teams...
Octafish
Jun 2014
#27
Ironically, according to Sibel Edmonds, the CIA is part of the nuclear black market
Oilwellian
Jun 2014
#34
Just shameful! And from the admin we worked so hard for to try to end these abuses.
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#44