Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Top 5 Claims That Defenders Of The NSA Have To Stop Making To Remain Credible - EFF [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)162. ONCE AGAIN, spare me.
My ONLY point was that you cannot blame this entirely on Obama and that it is silly to expect the administration to change this on its own.
You can't really call that a point, since I neither blamed everything on Obama nor expressed any expectation, silly or otherwise, that the administration would change on its own. Nor did I attack your motives. Didn't say you were a bad person either.
You might one time try addressing the actual points I am making instead attacking my motives
Right back at you. And which point? That's some expectation that I never said I had had is a silly expectation? Why that one? There must be millions of expectations that I never had that are silly. Shall we list every one of them and then pretend you made some kind of point?
But I guess that would be harder.
Very cheap attempted shot--and one that doesn't work, especially when what you consider the points you made had nothing to do with what I had actually posted. You erected straw men to avoid addressing what I actually said, then accused me of dodging your straw men because addressing them is supposed to be too difficult for me? Jaysus. I can't even give that a "nice try."
Why don't you try refuting some claim that I actually made before accusing me of ignoring your straw men because addressing them is supposedly too difficult for me?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
174 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Top 5 Claims That Defenders Of The NSA Have To Stop Making To Remain Credible - EFF [View all]
WillyT
Jun 2014
OP
Why didn't the NationalSpyAgency stop the greatest threat to national security since 9/11 ...
GeorgeGist
Jun 2014
#1
I find the need to label someone that is interested in regaining freedoms and liberties as a
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#95
It's naive for anyone to think that gaining power isnt the goal of most in politics.
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#109
There are plenty of non-libertarians who are interested in regaining freedoms and liberties
Fortinbras Armstrong
Jun 2014
#120
Good luck with your idea of a name the the logical fallacy. I think there is one but it's too early
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#124
"If you are looking for a needle in a haystack, the last thing you want to do is make the stack larg
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#104
Now if I was arguing for a RW talking point I would link RW talking point sites.
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#3
Never said it was, I posted IF i was arguing a RW talking point I would link a RW site.
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#31
They have an explanation on their web site, like I say if I want to have site to link to then
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#65
I never said it was a RW site, Willy answered something to that effect and you have said it also.
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#67
You must have read the wrong post, I NEVER SAID NSA SPYING IS A RW TALKING POINT>
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#97
You ask a lot of questions. Cant you make statements? What kind of a site do you think
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#78
And if you call about a close relative's medical condition -- would that act get you killed?
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2014
#18
Posts that begin with "SO" and followed by a fantasy statement that NOBODY has made...
bvar22
Jun 2014
#115
There are a number of posters that assert that the NSA's surveillance activities
Maedhros
Jun 2014
#32
"Those in charge of these programs know more about what is happening that we do"
Aerows
Jun 2014
#42
Posts that begin with "SO" and followed by a fantasy statement that NOBODY has made...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2014
#127
Please quote the provision of the Constitution that charges Congress with oversight of the
merrily
Jun 2014
#143
Regardless of what the NSA is or is not supposed to be, our govt. is not supposed to
merrily
Jun 2014
#132
Yet all of these arguments are in response to those who express concern with the growing
Maedhros
Jun 2014
#46
Those that openly disparage Snowden and Greenwald refuse to explain what they think about
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#80
You say "the vast majority" have separated the two issues. First I really wonder how you know how
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#102
Everyone who disagrees with you is not seeing things as they are? Only you are?
merrily
Jun 2014
#133
Yes, there are. There are also here people who remain strangely quiet about the NSA
merrily
Jun 2014
#126
More stuff I never said. Please, have pity on the straw men. They need their rest, too.
merrily
Jun 2014
#165
? Posts of yours on this very thread are, in essence, defenses of the NSA's actions.
merrily
Jun 2014
#140
I've bookmarked this thread and the article. The next time they use one of these talking points
riderinthestorm
Jun 2014
#52
Except that the alleged absence of any defense of the NSA by them is also a talking point.
merrily
Jun 2014
#139
yes that is how it looks to you because you do not revere the Constitution
questionseverything
Jun 2014
#166