Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Make No Mistake, Risen Case Is a Direct Attack on the Press [View all]pscot
(21,044 posts)37. Following your argument
if the Obama DOJ was justified in reviving the Sterling allegations, should they not, in the interest of consistency and fairness also reopened the Plame affair? There seems to be a double standard at work here. The full weight of the law is brought to bear against lower level leakers, but we're all about looking forward when high officials are involved. It smells bad.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When Judith Miller went to jail, it was Fitzmas. Now Risen faces the same charges,
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#1
More importantly: Why, after Bush dropped the matter, did Obama go after Risen?
Octafish
Jun 2014
#2
Bush dropped the matter? Kindly post the indictment of Sterling that predates the Obama
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#3
No--what it means is that the Bush DOJ already had one leak investigation going on, and
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#7
It originates in the ODS section of the federal code, where the President is completely to blame
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#13
As one of the site's identified paid shills (tm) I get paid piecework, not hourly.
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#16
The Plame affair was nonsense, in the sense the prosecutions did not go far enough. The Espionage
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#12
Borger's point seems not to be about secrecy, but about the idea that the CIA and FBI should
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#25
Sure--but Novak's dead, and Fitzgerald never could find evidence that Armitage knew of Plame's
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#38
Already done. On 6 March 2007 Libby was found guilty on four of the five counts against him.
ieoeja
Jun 2014
#39
How very old-fashioned of you Octafish! Didn't you know? That Bill of Rights, it's so 'quaint'
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#45
It's almost like there was some profound revelation made to him after inauguration
hootinholler
Jun 2014
#26
People say this but their is nothing possible much less plausible that changes anything
TheKentuckian
Jun 2014
#48
In a nation under law, there'd be no secret government, stay behind networks, Secret Teams...
Octafish
Jun 2014
#27
Ironically, according to Sibel Edmonds, the CIA is part of the nuclear black market
Oilwellian
Jun 2014
#34
Just shameful! And from the admin we worked so hard for to try to end these abuses.
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#44