Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tblue37

(68,436 posts)
43. Just as with machinery--or any other kind of system--the more "moving parts"
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 03:01 PM
Jun 2014

Last edited Wed Jun 4, 2014, 09:58 PM - Edit history (1)

involved, the more opportunity there is for something to go wrong. It takes only one small mistake or one small breakdown in the complex system to throw everything else completely out of whack, and then it usually takes a long time to check each element in the system to figure out where it went wrong.

If, as often happens, there is more than a single mistake, the lengthy checking process might have to be undertaken several times before the whole mess gets straightened out.

If they truly want to help the kids conceptualize like this, then all they have to do is supply each kid with an abacus. It is faster and simpler, and they are less likely to make a mistake, yet it creates a similar (though much clearer) visual representation of place values.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Little pink houses ... dawg Jun 2014 #1
There are three kinds of people in this world. kwassa Jun 2014 #2
There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Maedhros Jun 2014 #5
the only joke I know that can only be in written form central scrutinizer Jun 2014 #8
why do geeks get confused over holidays? maggiesfarmer Jun 2014 #47
Mathematics is full of great riddles.. DreamGypsy Jun 2014 #65
no wonder Jeneral2885 Jun 2014 #3
Have you seen this new math? Separation Jun 2014 #4
The unintended consequences of the TERC Investigations Math Curriculum mia Jun 2014 #12
Did you also see the YT "comments" of "Matthew Helm"? kentauros Jun 2014 #23
This Matt Helm? valerief Jun 2014 #61
No, not quite the same one. kentauros Jun 2014 #64
That's it right there. Separation Jun 2014 #24
Just as with machinery--or any other kind of system--the more "moving parts" tblue37 Jun 2014 #43
you said what I was thinking >>> teach them with an abacus. My Mom taught little kids KittyWampus Jun 2014 #63
What a freaking waste of time! Kids know how to count on their fingers. valerief Jun 2014 #60
Wow, just watching her solve that problem caused my head to hurt. Chisox08 Jun 2014 #70
sorry Jeneral2885 Jun 2014 #35
Are you from Great Britain or one of its former colonies? nt tblue37 Jun 2014 #44
I am a woman and I hate math. femmocrat Jun 2014 #6
I have many female colleagues... mike_c Jun 2014 #7
I didn't say it was. femmocrat Jun 2014 #54
No, you just said math was a waste of time. longship Jun 2014 #55
For me, it was. femmocrat Jun 2014 #56
I am a woman, and I hate math, but I LOVE numbers angstlessk Jun 2014 #10
I hated math and physics nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #11
Sure... those are real-life applications. femmocrat Jun 2014 #51
Calculus is freaking awesome! longship Jun 2014 #58
I use algebra all the time nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #59
I know exactly what you're talking about! kentauros Jun 2014 #66
Try to "figure out" how fast a contaminant plume will advance (plume velocity) etherealtruth Jun 2014 #67
You know Calculus is not advanced math MillennialDem Jun 2014 #69
My wife is a woman and teaches math. kwassa Jun 2014 #18
I liked math, but only up to a point. kentauros Jun 2014 #25
You use math every day of your life. Yavin4 Jun 2014 #49
Of course I do. Everyone does. femmocrat Jun 2014 #52
That's a slim majority! Gormy Cuss Jun 2014 #9
Slimmer than Bush*'s! KamaAina Jun 2014 #48
Holy shit! Where did you get this? (nt) stone space Jun 2014 #13
Off someone's FB page KamaAina Jun 2014 #37
Scientific American has a reference to it from 2011 whistler162 Jun 2014 #53
Maybe this pipi_k Jun 2014 #14
Even then, the majority do not "hate math" karynnj Jun 2014 #19
That would be a plurality, not a majority. gollygee Jun 2014 #36
Well maybe pipi_k Jun 2014 #45
most people sweetapogee Jun 2014 #15
Good for you ! Math instruction has changed a lot over the years ... eppur_se_muova Jun 2014 #20
I'm with 'em Armstead Jun 2014 #16
2x+(4x-7)+3y+(9a+5)= Brigid Jun 2014 #17
NO =1 Jeffersons Ghost Jun 2014 #33
I just have to save that graphic. eppur_se_muova Jun 2014 #21
4 in 3 Men hate math, yortsed snacilbuper Jun 2014 #22
And the writer of the article defacto7 Jun 2014 #26
+1 Jamaal510 Jun 2014 #30
Work with this in your toolbox Mopar151 Jun 2014 #27
I think math is awesome and I use it all the time. U4ikLefty Jun 2014 #28
Math is one of the main reasons why Jamaal510 Jun 2014 #29
Math is a language, a way of explaining the physical world. Ron Green Jun 2014 #31
THIS OPENING POST IS SEXIST AND OFFENSIVE! Jeffersons Ghost Jun 2014 #32
I dislike mathematics because I don't care to communicate that way. I prefer the nuances of language WinkyDink Jun 2014 #34
Your Hatred of Extraterrestrials Is Not My Problem! ProfessorGAC Jun 2014 #38
I love ETs! Those slanted eyes are to die for! WinkyDink Jun 2014 #39
I'll notify the University Aerows Jun 2014 #40
I shall contact my alma mater as well KamaAina Jun 2014 #41
+1 n/t Aerows Jun 2014 #42
I had a lousy teacher in high school who refused to explain anything more than twice. Manifestor_of_Light Jun 2014 #46
lol Liberal_in_LA Jun 2014 #50
don't drink and derive. nt antigop Jun 2014 #57
Hahahahaha etherealtruth Jun 2014 #62
I hate math bigwillq Jun 2014 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'We hate math', say a maj...»Reply #43