Greenwald uses Bergdahl to hit Obama, Democrats

[ProSense]

81. What?

Why are you saying this: The question is why is he making the case that either Obama can release them all or he broke the law?

When the article you cite actually says: Obama defenders seem to have two choices here: either the president broke the law in releasing these five detainees, or Congress cannot bind the commander-in-chief’s power to transfer detainees when he wants, thus leaving Obama free to make those decisions himself. Which is it?

Why did you change transfer to release? Are you trying to smear Greenwald or do you have a reading comprehension problem? Never mind, I think most of us already know the answer.

Why are you trying to play word games? Did you only read that one paragraph?

Greenwald, as cited in the OP:

The sole excuse now offered by Democratic loyalists for this failure has been that Congress prevented him from closing the camp. But here, the Obama White House appears to be arguing that Congress lacks the authority to constrain the President’s power to release detainees when he wants. What other excuse is there for his clear violation of a law that requires 30-day notice to Congress before any detainees are released?