Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Are you a Socialist? [View all]

hunter

(40,280 posts)
36. Yes.
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 04:49 PM
Jun 2014

I figure 51% of the economy and the wealth ought to be controlled democratically by "We the People" and 49% ought to be free market, but regulated tightly enough that it doesn't become too concentrated among a few individuals or giant corporations.

Imagine government medical, science, and technical research released to the world no strings attached.

Imagine high quality education and medical care available to everyone, no charge, all of it paid for by the people of this nation.

Large corporations these days strive to inhibit any sort of progress they cannot control, often by corrupting government regulatory agencies and the political process.

They also try to capture and control resources that belong to all of us for their own profit.

I think government agencies ought to compete directly with employers who do not pay or treat their workers well. Why are we giving WalMart workers food stamps when we might instead hire these same workers to do very necessary infrastructure improvements, teach them new skills, and pay them living wages?

With that kind of competition, directly from government, WalMart would have to pay their workers living wages and treat them fairly, otherwise they simply wouldn't be able to find anyone willing to work for them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Are you a Socialist? [View all] Douglas Carpenter Jun 2014 OP
A working definition would help. Smarmie Doofus Jun 2014 #1
In the absence of another definition, here's an encyclopedia article: muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #2
No, I am not a Socialist. dawg Jun 2014 #3
Democratic socialism is also a form of socialism, a blend of regulated capitalism and tblue37 Jun 2014 #26
Libertarian Communist - TBF Jun 2014 #4
Lemme check... yep, my library card is in my wallet. Scuba Jun 2014 #5
I believe I am a commonist HereSince1628 Jun 2014 #6
well the rethugs say obama is a socialist--and i know i am left of him...... dembotoz Jun 2014 #7
same here TeamPooka Jun 2014 #28
We're all socialists to one degree or another, even conservatives Armstead Jun 2014 #8
I think the question is, which of the two do you prefer. PowerToThePeople Jun 2014 #11
Balance Armstead Jun 2014 #12
Absolutely not. On economic policy I mostly agree with President Obama (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #9
^^this^^ Puzzledtraveller Jun 2014 #34
Except for that pesky Citizens United thing... Ohio Joe Jun 2014 #44
I said "economic policy". Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #46
You don't think allowing corporations to buy elections has anything to do with that? Ohio Joe Jun 2014 #47
On issues where Obama disagrees with the ACLU, Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #48
And by coincidence, repugs Ohio Joe Jun 2014 #53
Not a big fan of the ACLU, are you? (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #54
I am not a big fan of corporate ownership of our govt Ohio Joe Jun 2014 #55
Not now nor will I ever be. eom MohRokTah Jun 2014 #10
It's sad that we have let the right malign the word so much Lee-Lee Jun 2014 #13
The user name says it all...... socialist_n_TN Jun 2014 #14
I pass because the term is too vague rock Jun 2014 #15
Not sure Prophet 451 Jun 2014 #16
kik Douglas Carpenter Jun 2014 #17
Yes. (nt) stone space Jun 2014 #18
Yeh. Zorra Jun 2014 #19
IN other words, do you consider yourselves a socialist? Douglas Carpenter Jun 2014 #20
another kick Douglas Carpenter Jun 2014 #21
We are all socialists. Good thing, too. baldguy Jun 2014 #22
f0r more results Douglas Carpenter Jun 2014 #23
again Douglas Carpenter Jun 2014 #24
Socialism Can Be A Relative Term Dirty Socialist Jun 2014 #25
Proudly! [n/t] Maedhros Jun 2014 #27
yes I am. liberal_at_heart Jun 2014 #29
Yep. Still Blue in PDX Jun 2014 #30
Some fool at discussionist posted this thread as an example of DU being a "cesspool" quinnox Jun 2014 #31
well yes, Both Mao and Tony Blair called themselves Socialist - so obviously different people mean Douglas Carpenter Jun 2014 #32
Socialism is such a broad topic that it's hard to nail down. NuclearDem Jun 2014 #49
In the Europaean sense, yes LeftishBrit Jun 2014 #33
I am poor, I am not a socialist. Puzzledtraveller Jun 2014 #35
Yes. hunter Jun 2014 #36
Yup. One of them there European-kind ones. KamaAina Jun 2014 #37
Social Democrats are not socialists, so no DFW Jun 2014 #38
I favor a much heavier portion of socialism in our mixed economy than we have now for sure. TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #39
k Douglas Carpenter Jun 2014 #40
In that I reject private property, yes. joshcryer Jun 2014 #41
I pass. I very much dislike labels. scarletwoman Jun 2014 #42
By todays standards... Easily... Ohio Joe Jun 2014 #43
Is the Pope a, yortsed snacilbuper Jun 2014 #45
I'm a Social Democrat in the vein of German politics. KittyWampus Jun 2014 #50
Me too. NT Adrahil Jun 2014 #56
I don't know what I am...I do know yuiyoshida Jun 2014 #51
Is socialism the opposite of capitalism? el_bryanto Jun 2014 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are you a Socialist?»Reply #36