Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Glenn Greenwald ain't no Libertarian, Part 1: Defending Social Security and Medicare [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(106,857 posts)225. We've had the Koch stuff dealt with already
In this thread? Another of the "We Must All Hate Greenwald" threads? Who knows. Here it is:
I am not now, nor have I ever been, employed by the Cato Institute. Nor have I ever been affiliated with the Cato Institute in any way. The McCarthyite tone of the denials is appropriate given the McCarthyite nature of the lie.
In seven-plus years of political writing, I have written a grand total of twice for Cato: the first was a 2009 report on the success of drug decriminalization in Portugal, and the second was a 2010 online debate in which I argued against former Bush officials about the evils of the surveillance state.
I not only disclosed those writings but wrote about them and featured them multiple times on my blog as it happened: see here and here as but two examples. In 2008, I spoke at a Cato event on the radicalism and destructiveness of Bush/Cheney executive power theories.That's the grand total of all the work I ever did for or with Cato in my life. The fees for those two papers and that one speech were my standard writing and speaking fees. Those payments are a miniscule, microscopic fraction of my writing and speaking income over the last 7 years. I have done no paying work of any kind with them since that online surveillance debate in 2010 (I spoke three times at Cato for free: once to debate the theme of my 2007 book on the failure of the Bush administration, and twice when I presented my paper advocating drug decriminalization).
I have done far more work for, and received far greater payments from, the ACLU, with which I consulted for two years (see here). I spoke at the Socialism Conference twice - once in 2011 and once in 2012 - and will almost certainly do so again in 2013. I'll speak or write basically anywhere where I can have my ideas heard without any constraints. Moreover, I'll work with almost anyone - the ACLU, Cato or anyone else - to end the evils of the Drug War and the Surveillance State. And I'll criticize anyone I think merits it, as I did quite harshly with the Koch Brothers in 2011: here.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/30/1182442/-Glenn-Greenwald-Responds-to-Widespread-Lies-About-Him-on-Cato-Iraq-War-and-more
In seven-plus years of political writing, I have written a grand total of twice for Cato: the first was a 2009 report on the success of drug decriminalization in Portugal, and the second was a 2010 online debate in which I argued against former Bush officials about the evils of the surveillance state.
I not only disclosed those writings but wrote about them and featured them multiple times on my blog as it happened: see here and here as but two examples. In 2008, I spoke at a Cato event on the radicalism and destructiveness of Bush/Cheney executive power theories.That's the grand total of all the work I ever did for or with Cato in my life. The fees for those two papers and that one speech were my standard writing and speaking fees. Those payments are a miniscule, microscopic fraction of my writing and speaking income over the last 7 years. I have done no paying work of any kind with them since that online surveillance debate in 2010 (I spoke three times at Cato for free: once to debate the theme of my 2007 book on the failure of the Bush administration, and twice when I presented my paper advocating drug decriminalization).
I have done far more work for, and received far greater payments from, the ACLU, with which I consulted for two years (see here). I spoke at the Socialism Conference twice - once in 2011 and once in 2012 - and will almost certainly do so again in 2013. I'll speak or write basically anywhere where I can have my ideas heard without any constraints. Moreover, I'll work with almost anyone - the ACLU, Cato or anyone else - to end the evils of the Drug War and the Surveillance State. And I'll criticize anyone I think merits it, as I did quite harshly with the Koch Brothers in 2011: here.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/30/1182442/-Glenn-Greenwald-Responds-to-Widespread-Lies-About-Him-on-Cato-Iraq-War-and-more
So, no, he doesn't "take paychecks from Koch". He has had 2 articles, both on civil liberties, published by Cato. Yes, he is now employed by Omidyar; explain how that makes him a Libertarian, when his political views are clearly not Libertarian. Yes, he makes attacks from the left; that's my whole fucking point - he's not Libertarian.
Obama offered the chained CPI social security; the Republicans were too right wing (and/or dumb, from their point of view) to take it. A huge number of DUers were really worried about it. Are you saying they were all secret Libertarians, 'specializing in attacks from the left'?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
243 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Glenn Greenwald ain't no Libertarian, Part 1: Defending Social Security and Medicare [View all]
MannyGoldstein
Jun 2014
OP
Racist is what racist says and " it was my early days" (sic) != a changed mind
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#123
Explain why Libertarin Greenwald consistently attacks reporters covering the Koch cartel
kfreed
Aug 2014
#235
"If you don't like someone criticizing your Beloved Leader, you could always move to North Korea."
Number23
Jun 2014
#29
Clue: Australian Wikileaks Party (Assange) preferences fascists, mens righters, and gun humpers...
kfreed
Aug 2014
#237
Let's not forget the Three Libertarians tour he took.with Bruce Fein right before
msanthrope
Jun 2014
#93
Damn, Ma'am: I Knew The Fella Had Problems, But What Is At that Link Is Way Over The Top
The Magistrate
Aug 2014
#242
I don't see anything about Greenwald laughing at a joke about Obama raping a nun
MannyGoldstein
Aug 2014
#243
I found it rich that Greenwald trashed Sen. Warren during her tough campaign against Scott Brown.
MADem
Jun 2014
#173
Apparently, the man doesn't get to define himself when DU's clairvoyances' are on the hunt!Tally ho!
Luminous Animal
Jun 2014
#13
Damn good find Whisp. Lot of egg on quite a few faces. Anonymous, Sibel Edmonds,
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2014
#70
The statement that Ron Paul was an anti-war candidate was, in fact, accurate.
Jim Lane
Jun 2014
#172
Nope, they have their opinion and their conclusions on the racist bastard is wrong
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#124
long string of site disruptions, takeovers, shut downs when things get too liberal elsewhere
reddread
Jun 2014
#73
I think one of them is. And I'm not throwing any Godwin at you when I say that, either.
MADem
Jun 2014
#174
Let's scrutinize: "THE RIGHT HAND OF OCCUPY WALL STREET: FROM LIBERTARIANS TO NAZIS..."
kfreed
Aug 2014
#240
Option 3 holds sway. Now, do you have what it takes to withdraw your claims?
DisgustipatedinCA
Jun 2014
#113
He used it as a compliment: "the crown legislative jewels of American liberalism"
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2014
#138
You're wrong, if you think Greenwald, or Manny, are in that 'they' you've conjured up
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2014
#204
We have audio from Democracy Now from a week later, so you can literally hear
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2014
#206
He takes paychecks from Koch and Omidyar, and specializes in "from the left" attacks.
MADem
Jun 2014
#214
I don't think that's the problem, really. We all know the original meaning of the term.
MADem
Jun 2014
#220
But Greenwald is not a GOP supporter, and you've *heard* him say the word
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2014
#228
Libertarian and Reagan Welfare Queen Republican--it's one of Frank Luntz's favorite digs.
MADem
Jun 2014
#195
Ha ha ha ha!!!!!!!! I provided you with three links. I proved what I was saying.
MADem
Jun 2014
#212
Sophistry, no mention of social security... Most GG support is packed with sophistry
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#125
What else is an "entitlement" and when did Obama offer to cut any of them?
MannyGoldstein
Jun 2014
#128
no mention of social security in that statement no matter what pretzel logic is used...
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#150
the false equivalency of "Libertarian" and "libertarian" turns the ACLU into Ayn Rand groupies
carolinayellowdog
Jun 2014
#98
Why is it that Greenwald does his defending by criticising Obama and Democrats but not Republicans??
DCBob
Jun 2014
#163
Not in the least. I criticize Democrats more than Republicans because I hold Democrats
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#167
Yeah why be against cuts when they're floated/proposed? I mean, why fight to stop the cuts?
neverforget
Jun 2014
#184
And let's not forget to thank Greenwald for singlehandedly turning back the invaders from Mars!
struggle4progress
Jun 2014
#188