Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

bigtree

(93,309 posts)
Fri Jun 6, 2014, 11:13 AM Jun 2014

A Devaluation of the Idea of Heroism [View all]

from Paul Waldman at WaPo:


____ Some years ago, the country came to a collective realization that the people who fight in a war don’t bear personal responsibility for whether the war was a good idea in the first place. This was an immensely salutary development, one that led to the important acknowledgement of the risks that service members take on. The image of the military improved dramatically, and Americans began looking at those in uniform with new admiration. Service members couldn’t walk through an airport without a dozen people walking up to them to thank them for their service. That’s all good.

But along with it came a devaluation of the idea of heroism. We began to regularly refer to any and all members of the military as “heroes,” without any regard to what they had or hadn’t done in their service. If we use the same term to refer to someone who risked his life to save his fellow soldiers in a valley in Afghanistan as we do for someone who effectively conducted data entry for personnel files at a base in North Carolina, “hero” has lost nearly all its meaning.

Conservatives are up in arms over the fact that Susan Rice said Bergdahl “served with honor and distinction” before he was captured by the Taliban. But how many times have we heard that phrase? It’s become a meaningless throwaway line. These days, if a soldier managed not to frag his commanding officer and drive his Humvee off a cliff, we say he “served with honor and distinction.”

From what we’ve learned so far about Bergdhal (granting that we will certainly learn more), it seems he was an ordinary soldier. He didn’t perform any super-human acts, but he did his job competently. He was something of a quirky guy. He was disillusioned with the Afghan war (like most Americans). He didn’t fit in very well with his comrades . . .

And yet, to hear the administration’s opponents tell it, unless Bergdahl was a true “hero,” a square-jawed, gung-ho Steve Rogers type who had performed acts of uncommon valor and self-sacrifice, then perhaps this swap wasn’t worth it. But that’s a dangerous position to take. There are 1.4 million men and women currently in uniform. Some of them are genuine heroes. Some are villains – in a group that large, there are murderers and rapists, too. But most are just regular people, trying to serve their country and do their jobs as best they can, whether those jobs involve risk to life and limb or not . . .


read: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/06/06/its-true-bowe-bergdahl-wasnt-a-hero-so-what/

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Devaluation of the Idea...