Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)

7. So ...

Reply to oldhippie (Reply #4)

Mon Apr 2, 2012, 11:19 AM

Apr 2012

Maybe the OP should have said " And your chance of winning was still NEAR, BUT SO DAMN CLOSE AS TO BE VIEWED AS, ZERO?

Would that meet you exacting standard?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What Mega Millions Can Teach Us About Trayvon Martin Backlash [View all] Ian David Apr 2012 OP

Same type of logic can be used to say that guns aren't really a problem belcffub Apr 2012 #1

And to prevent a crime even less than zero. n/t Ian David Apr 2012 #2

Closer to zero maybe belcffub Apr 2012 #3

I stopped reading right here ... oldhippie Apr 2012 #4

Thank you. The fact that there were 3 announced winners really does undercut the ZERO chance. TalkingDog Apr 2012 #5

So ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2012 #7

Wouldn't you expect exactness in an article ...... oldhippie Apr 2012 #8

I understand your point ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2012 #9

This is exactly why we need to open up these white islands in these red counties. Baitball Blogger Apr 2012 #6