Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
2. They fell into the trap of parroting Fox speculation based on the rumours reported to a private
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:48 PM
Jun 2014

intelligence firm paid to provide information, and, viola, information they prided in droves.

The truth of that information is an entirely different matter than the propaganda value.

The source of this juicy gossip, from the article, "That account, provided by a former senior military officer briefed on the investigation into the private’s disappearance,.....".

WTF does that even mean?

Sloppy reporting, with the sloppiness admitted, but no one cared in the rush to judgment the media is famous for in America.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT says there was NO sti...»Reply #2