Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Billionaire Gets 4 MONTHS For Sexually Assaulting 12-Year-Old Because He’s ‘Productive’ [View all]dsc
(53,398 posts)22. then he deserves some blame here
but the main problem was the deal necessitated by the lack of testimony.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Billionaire Gets 4 MONTHS For Sexually Assaulting 12-Year-Old Because He’s ‘Productive’ [View all]
tabasco
Jun 2014
OP
The judge in this case should be heavily sentenced right along with the sexual assaulter for his
lumpy
Jun 2014
#1
Wonder how much money transpired from the defendant, to his lawyer, to the judge.
Tuesday Afternoon
Jun 2014
#4
Plutocracies won't stop just because wealthy people are far removed from normal law.
Rex
Jun 2014
#12
Similar thing happened where I live. The one thing the guy had to do was register
mackerel
Jun 2014
#13
You assume that the only reason a sex crime victim would refuse to testify is that she was bribed?
Jim Lane
Jun 2014
#41
The customers of the Boys Town sex ring were "captains of industry" too.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jun 2014
#60