Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
5. I think this commentary is a little off-target
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 12:42 PM
Apr 2012
Consider what these statements about education imply. What is the result the educators want after these people have been educated?

To realize what posting information about yourself publicly really means.

And what if those educated choose to continue their behavior?

Then they're making an educated decision, instead of not knowing just what they were broadcasting.

What of those who decide to live in public? The camgirls we have met? The ones that share their lives with abandon?

Personally, I think they need some psychological counseling, but they're free to do so.

While a person 'living publicly' isn't 'fair game', this editorial kinda goes too far in considering that the only issue.

IMO, the anger should be directed at social media sites that make it easy to be public, and hard to be private. Killing "Girls Around Me" doesn't suddenly make the information disappear. Facebook and Foursquare still display it. It will just take a few minutes to manually put the two together. And cheering the death of that app while not educating people, because that would be "victim blaming", means people are being far more public than they realize.

They are not able to make the educated decision to be public. Teaching them isn't blaming the victim. It's letting them choose what they wish to do.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Creating Victims And Then...»Reply #5