Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bread_and_roses

(6,335 posts)

4. It will indeed involve large monetary losses -

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Mon Jun 9, 2014, 09:02 AM

Jun 2014

Krugman's anodyne examples have had little to no impact on global climate change and neither will any "market-friendly" interventions ... it is Capitalism itself that has to go, along with the economies of endless "growth" as currently defined and the culture of consumerism.

As those things are unlikely to happen - especially with widely respected pundits like Krugman saying "now, now, it's not so bad ..." we can kiss just about everything including humanity goodbye.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

KRUGMAN:...think about global warming from the point of view of someone who grew up taking Ayn Rand [View all] kpete Jun 2014 OP

Brilliant piece. k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Jun 2014 #1

Delusions Die Hard cantbeserious Jun 2014 #2

K&R rosesaylavee Jun 2014 #3

It will indeed involve large monetary losses - bread_and_roses Jun 2014 #4

And that's because Krugman himself IS a capitalist..... socialist_n_TN Jun 2014 #8

I don't know if these anti science/anti fact people are proud to be stupid or just plain stupid Botany Jun 2014 #5

Excellent. However, only having read the OP I do have a comment. rhett o rick Jun 2014 #6

I don't often agree with a Keynesian capitalist like Krugman........ socialist_n_TN Jun 2014 #7

Krugman seems to miss something from a few years ago.... Leme Jun 2014 #9

I heard some of those "scientists" were TV weathermen. tclambert Jun 2014 #11

And some were economists, truebluegreen Jun 2014 #12

Yeah, they were scientists of a sort Leme Jun 2014 #14

I disagree that those people were "scientists." truebluegreen Jun 2014 #15

that's the point Leme Jun 2014 #18

OMG you reminded me, my X-boss signed that letter tea and oranges Jun 2014 #16

I usually agree with Krugman, but not this time. tclambert Jun 2014 #10

I think that you may be onto something. drm604 Jun 2014 #19

It's Obvious - And The Denialist Poster Boy Is Marco Rubio - IGNORANT and PROUD OF IT ! stuartsdesk1 Jun 2014 #13

disagree. that ayn randian wet dreaming is not that potent. the problem is talk radio, which certainot Jun 2014 #17

RW Christian Dominionists too ErikJ Jun 2014 #20

This is not the first time the world has been fooled randr Jun 2014 #21

Naomi Klein made the same point (from a slightly different angle) three years ago... RufusTFirefly Jun 2014 #22