Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: drunken downfall of beloved artist thomas kinkade [View all]CTyankee
(68,499 posts)122. but I think he fails at that...don't you?
Jeez, you look at a Vermeer, with his light coming thru windows, and you look at Kinkade and there is NO relation to it? What the hell?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
212 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
well, yeah! Why did he even do it if he didn't expect some critical examination of his work?
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#50
He had decent technical skills, but his paintings are sentimental dreck.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2014
#11
His and Boris Vallejo's works seem to be the precise same branding overlaid onto two distinctly diff
LanternWaste
Jun 2014
#12
googled boris vallejo. omg. would be less embarrassed to display kinkaid art.
Liberal_in_LA
Jun 2014
#17
Always saddened to hear when anyone falls victim to their personal demons . . .
Journeyman
Jun 2014
#15
Yes, and, in the franchised Kincade Galleries, they would show you how...
GReedDiamond
Jun 2014
#141
I was responding to your remark about how her art was out of elementary school...your point not mine
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#147
And his stuff is dishonest...that makes me angrier than anything else about him...
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#206
I think you have little knowledge of what art is, judging by what you have said so far.
kwassa
Jun 2014
#131
OK, thanks...I am relieved... I was ready to despair completely...thank you...
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#113
I am in the process of preparing a little art essay to put on GD about Rockwell...
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#75
Yeah, I'm still on the fence with Rockwell...part of me wants to love him but part of me hates
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#96
I used to dislike Rockwell because of the sentimental subject matter.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2014
#117
I felt he was maudlin and cheesy until I saw an exhibit that included his civil rights work
sweetloukillbot
Jun 2014
#143
Kinkade *should* have studied Vermeer, who was a true painter of light.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2014
#105
That's my point. If Kinkade had seriously studied the way Vermeer handled light
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2014
#114
Vermeer did not do what Kinkade purports to do....in fact Vermeer has only two paintings that
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#116
I'm not sure what you're getting at, but yes, there should be some basic understanding
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2014
#123
I think both...he didn't care that much because he was painting for a specific audience he knew
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#126
Many hacks have skill. Why are there never people in his decorations? I consider his paintings
Lint Head
Jun 2014
#40
Since all that human beings see is light, this covers every painter who every lived.
kwassa
Jun 2014
#79
Here's what I do: I see a pic, right click and click on "save image location" and it will appear
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#162
I think my sequencing is correct...I am very forgetful recently...it seems like I have to
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#165
You're right. The light is totally wrong, mixing different times of day in the same painting.
kwassa
Jun 2014
#133
Laughing at "ritual territorial urination". I'm sorry, that's just fucking funny.
TwilightGardener
Jun 2014
#77