Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: drunken downfall of beloved artist thomas kinkade [View all]nolabear
(43,850 posts)125. Last I heard he didn't paint his "paintings."
There was a huge scandal about it. I never heard it debunked, and here's one of many articles about it.
http://beforeitsnews.com/arts/2012/05/thomas-kinkade-art-scandal-continues-to-unfold-2170107.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
212 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
well, yeah! Why did he even do it if he didn't expect some critical examination of his work?
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#50
He had decent technical skills, but his paintings are sentimental dreck.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2014
#11
His and Boris Vallejo's works seem to be the precise same branding overlaid onto two distinctly diff
LanternWaste
Jun 2014
#12
googled boris vallejo. omg. would be less embarrassed to display kinkaid art.
Liberal_in_LA
Jun 2014
#17
Always saddened to hear when anyone falls victim to their personal demons . . .
Journeyman
Jun 2014
#15
Yes, and, in the franchised Kincade Galleries, they would show you how...
GReedDiamond
Jun 2014
#141
I was responding to your remark about how her art was out of elementary school...your point not mine
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#147
And his stuff is dishonest...that makes me angrier than anything else about him...
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#206
I think you have little knowledge of what art is, judging by what you have said so far.
kwassa
Jun 2014
#131
OK, thanks...I am relieved... I was ready to despair completely...thank you...
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#113
I am in the process of preparing a little art essay to put on GD about Rockwell...
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#75
Yeah, I'm still on the fence with Rockwell...part of me wants to love him but part of me hates
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#96
I used to dislike Rockwell because of the sentimental subject matter.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2014
#117
I felt he was maudlin and cheesy until I saw an exhibit that included his civil rights work
sweetloukillbot
Jun 2014
#143
Kinkade *should* have studied Vermeer, who was a true painter of light.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2014
#105
That's my point. If Kinkade had seriously studied the way Vermeer handled light
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2014
#114
Vermeer did not do what Kinkade purports to do....in fact Vermeer has only two paintings that
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#116
I'm not sure what you're getting at, but yes, there should be some basic understanding
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2014
#123
I think both...he didn't care that much because he was painting for a specific audience he knew
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#126
Many hacks have skill. Why are there never people in his decorations? I consider his paintings
Lint Head
Jun 2014
#40
Since all that human beings see is light, this covers every painter who every lived.
kwassa
Jun 2014
#79
Here's what I do: I see a pic, right click and click on "save image location" and it will appear
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#162
I think my sequencing is correct...I am very forgetful recently...it seems like I have to
CTyankee
Jun 2014
#165
You're right. The light is totally wrong, mixing different times of day in the same painting.
kwassa
Jun 2014
#133
Laughing at "ritual territorial urination". I'm sorry, that's just fucking funny.
TwilightGardener
Jun 2014
#77