Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A History of Liberal White Racism [View all]kwassa
(23,340 posts)28. The American Communist Party was the only civil rights supporter ...
during the 1930s and 1940s of any American political party.
The party's most widely reported work in the South was its defense, through the ILD, of the "Scottsboro Boys", nine black men arrested in 1931 after a fight with some white men also riding the rails, then convicted and sentenced to death for raping two white women later found on the same train. None of the defendants had shared the same boxcar as either of the women they were charged with raping.
The International Labor Defense was the first to offer its assistance. William L. Patterson, a black attorney who had left behind a successful practice to join the Communist Party, returned from training in the Soviet Union to run the ILD. After fierce disputes with the NAACP, with the ILD seeking to mount a broad-based political campaign to free the nine while the NAACP followed a more legalistic strategy, the ILD took control over the defendants' appeals.
The ILD successfully overturned their convictions on appeal to the United States Supreme Court, which held in Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932) that the State's failure to provide the defendants with counsel in a capital case violated their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The ILD's battles with the NAACP continued when the cases returned to Alabama for retrial, when the NAACP blamed the ILD for the conviction and death sentence handed down by the jury in the retrial of the lead defendant. While the NAACP later backtracked and agreed to join with the ILD in defending the nine after other black organizations and a number of NAACP branches attacked it for that position, the tensions never disappeared and the ILD retained control of the second round of appeals. It won reversals of these convictions in Norris v. Alabama, 294 U.S. 587 (1935) on the ground that the exclusion of blacks from the jury pool had violated the defendants' constitutional rights. Even so, all of the defendants were convicted on their third retrial.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Communist_Party_USA_and_African_Americans
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
228 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm sorry to say this, but, truthfully, Juror #1 got it right more than anyone else.
AverageJoe90
Jun 2014
#154
I wonder that too since the British did offer freedom to Blacks who fought on their side.
bravenak
Jun 2014
#10
Oh, yes, some Brits did.....but not really out of altruism(not in most cases), mind you.
AverageJoe90
Jun 2014
#77
That's a benefit - but honestly - if i get it on my Kindle I'm likely to read it
el_bryanto
Jun 2014
#96
Do you see it as part of 'The Family' as some of the same players are there?
freshwest
Jun 2014
#218
Yes, I've used the same technique. Embrace their reality, befriend their heroes and despise their
freshwest
Jun 2014
#221
so this is how the right wing accuses some black people from those days of being commies
JI7
Jun 2014
#33
But wait, we're all told that Obama is a traitor, and FDR was a saint!
ConservativeDemocrat
Jun 2014
#34
They also kidnapped and sterilized poor whites, a source of old white anti-government hatred.
freshwest
Jun 2014
#220
I think we need to look at it from today's standard so that we don't slip back.
bravenak
Jun 2014
#54
Thanks for the link. In contrast, LBJ was willing to push for the Civil Rights Act
alp227
Jun 2014
#70
the reason there is less support for Govt programs is because it's seen as benefiting Blacks and
JI7
Jun 2014
#176
The "Democratic Party" used to mean Majority Rule, as in the White Majority....
Spitfire of ATJ
Jun 2014
#56
Yeah......I'm sorry, but Katznelson pretty much falls short on this. Coates too.
AverageJoe90
Jun 2014
#76
That's basically what Katznelson and Coates implied.....even if not intentionally, perhaps.
AverageJoe90
Jun 2014
#85
"You sound very young, very idealistic." I used to be idealistic myself, yes, I will be honest.
AverageJoe90
Jun 2014
#159
That's funny. I can cite quite a few specifics about why I know it exists.
Baitball Blogger
Jun 2014
#194
Most studies on "American" history don't even begin to tell the whole story...
countryjake
Jun 2014
#145
Yes, it was indeed sickeningly sweet, but recognizing the need for Black Studies...
countryjake
Jun 2014
#156
Not sure if I want to go thru the trouble of spending hours & hours digging.....
AverageJoe90
Jun 2014
#171
Then it shouldn't be difficult to answer my earlier question: what are some of his right-wing
fishwax
Jun 2014
#185
The eugenics movement is not acceptable by anyone today and not acceptable
Harmony Blue
Jun 2014
#123
There IS racism in White Liberal America. Many people of color have experienced this
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jun 2014
#121
I think I read it. I haven't been on DU for awhile, but I do remember.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jun 2014
#127
If i do i will make sure to do a GBCW for you and let you know where i go or get your facebooks.
bravenak
Jun 2014
#184
Yeh. Thomas Jefferson, founder of the Democratic Party, was a racist who owned slaves.
Zorra
Jun 2014
#142