Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
3. Thought provoking? More like a bunch of revisionist agitprop.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 03:08 AM
Jun 2014

As I totally correctly pointed out in the other thread: Ted Bilbo was no genuine liberal/progressive. Not even close. He was, in fact, an extreme right-wing faux-populist; he was merely taking advantage of the surge in progressivism's popularity by latching himself onto a certain few causes, and talking a likable game(even supposedly fooling Roosevelt at one point). But deep down, he was always a reactionary, but merely an opprotunistic one. And you know what? There's guys just like that today; one of the greatest examples of such would be Rand Paul. Paul claims to be against the drug wars, and even pays lip service to anger against bankers on Wall Street.....(and sadly, some people actually have fallen for his schtick.) By the logic utilized by Coates and Katznelson here, Paul, too, according to that, is a progressive liberal.

But in reality, he's not. Neither was Ted Bilbo, and anyone who believes otherwise is frankly either naive, or even deluded.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thought-provoking article YoungDemCA Jun 2014 #1
I agree. bravenak Jun 2014 #2
"We tend to forget the bad and laud the good." Heidi Jun 2014 #6
Thought provoking? More like a bunch of revisionist agitprop. AverageJoe90 Jun 2014 #3
Great read Cali_Democrat Jun 2014 #4
You're welcome. bravenak Jun 2014 #5
K and R/ This is important etherealtruth Jun 2014 #7
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A History of Liberal Whit...»Reply #3