Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
49. Exactly. Primaries are now being used as tools to maintain two party control it is obvious.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 09:44 AM
Jun 2014

Almost all political parties outside America choose local delegates of their party to go to a central convention to cast votes, not some "official" State vote paid for by the taxpayer.

Taxpayers paying for political party nominations is crazy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The USA is pretty rare in having primaries at all muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #1
Voting is not really public input, it is public manipulation in a two party state. Fred Sanders Jun 2014 #2
In that case, then the turnout for a primary is irrelevant for you muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #4
Well, when you put it that way ... Igel Jun 2014 #6
Yes, voting is so important, but....... dem in texas Jun 2014 #3
We just had 50-60% turnout in a primary election in my WV county tabasco Jun 2014 #5
Iowa primary turnout, a hot bed of politics...... Fred Sanders Jun 2014 #8
OK, there's Iowa. tabasco Jun 2014 #12
"West Virginia primary turnout less than 20 percent" Chathamization Jun 2014 #24
My registrar was giddy we hit the 20s nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #30
The sine qua non of Democracy is the *right* to participate in politics. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2014 #7
Actually it is a serious problem since it indicates a non working democracy nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #15
I'm not sure I can give you much more of an answer than "no it doesn't". Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2014 #16
Because the US does not have voter suppression nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #27
do you think we should pass a law that makes voting mandatory ? JI7 Jun 2014 #9
Absolutely. Australia and 22 other countries do it, small fines are the punishment, the idea is to Fred Sanders Jun 2014 #10
i would say we would need a federal holiday for voting day before we could do that JI7 Jun 2014 #11
We have that here in Korea davidpdx Jun 2014 #18
+ struggle4progress Jun 2014 #19
Voting 'week'. Or 'month', even. randome Jun 2014 #28
Mandatory voting would not be constitutional in America tritsofme Jun 2014 #43
No MosheFeingold Jun 2014 #45
Not our fault people are apathetic. They need to get off their asses and go to the polls. RBInMaine Jun 2014 #13
Less than 16% for NC's in May. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #14
Yes, pathetic. The Kochs recognized this soft underbelly of American democracy and is ripping at it. Fred Sanders Jun 2014 #32
Oregon's primary was about 32% davidpdx Jun 2014 #17
Make voting mandatory, along with mandatory classes on issues Lee-Lee Jun 2014 #20
Right....and we'd all agree on who should teach the classes, right? brooklynite Jun 2014 #23
Whats the penalty for not voting Travis_0004 Jun 2014 #26
Soldiers are not dying to spread democracy. Skidmore Jun 2014 #21
Well then, here's to North Korea... brooklynite Jun 2014 #22
That is silly. Australia is a better comparison, by far. Fred Sanders Jun 2014 #33
Because we all know mandatory elections nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #48
At the very least, we should probably stop using the term oligarchy Chathamization Jun 2014 #25
Not voting is actually a clarion sign of an oligarchy nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #29
Except their vote does matter. Chathamization Jun 2014 #34
Except power concedes nothing nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #35
Except the whole point of this thread is that "we" don't vote; a few Chathamization Jun 2014 #36
Well given I report nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #37
Not just know their names, but their actual positions. Chathamization Jun 2014 #39
I report on the local political scene nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #40
Our Mayors and councilmembers have a lot of power, and don't seem to be influenced by the national Chathamization Jun 2014 #41
While what you say is true nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #42
While I agree with much of what you said, I don’t see local politics as changing the subject or the Chathamization Jun 2014 #46
And they are not involved because they feel they nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #47
in states that have caucuses like Iowa betterdemsonly Jun 2014 #31
A lot of people are idiots MosheFeingold Jun 2014 #38
Primaries are not a requirement of democracy. JVS Jun 2014 #44
Exactly. Primaries are now being used as tools to maintain two party control it is obvious. Fred Sanders Jun 2014 #49
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Primaries have about 10% ...»Reply #49