Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(11,804 posts)

15. Source for the claims in that graphic. What else would I mean?

Tue Jun 10, 2014, 10:22 AM

Jun 2014

Also, are you really calling me to task for not reading posts that hadn't been posted yet when I asked my question?

Bryant

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WTF ... 2 [View all] MindMover Jun 2014 OP

Is there a source on this? nt el_bryanto Jun 2014 #1

Source for the claims in that graphic. What else would I mean? el_bryanto Jun 2014 #15

Sad. nt. el_bryanto Jun 2014 #20

That's nothing, Check This Out! snooper2 Jun 2014 #2

Holy Mother of God. Xyzse Jun 2014 #7

Shave the beards and sell them for wigs ... nt MindMover Jun 2014 #11

They are from Canada snooper2 Jun 2014 #12

A requirement for who, Al Querda ... nt MindMover Jun 2014 #13

BT toxins have no effect on humans,or any sufrommich Jun 2014 #3

Sure enough, your study is one opinion ... MindMover Jun 2014 #4

Snopes says false. djean111 Jun 2014 #5

Snopes is not a science organization ... MindMover Jun 2014 #6

I actually would tend to believe your link over Snopes :-) djean111 Jun 2014 #8

Here's a link to the Snopes Article el_bryanto Jun 2014 #16

not to mention the bug guts lame54 Jun 2014 #9

A Buch Of Articles On The Bt Toxin Here: WillyT Jun 2014 #21

Well isn't that special. polly7 Jun 2014 #22