Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
28. It's there somewhere but Here, knock yourself out:
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 02:15 PM
Jun 2014
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/04/20/499591/-Richard-Mellon-Scaife-s-Pittsburgh-Tribune-Endorses-Hillary

Sun Apr 20, 2008 at 02:02 PM PDT
Richard Mellon Scaife's Pittsburgh Tribune Endorses Hillary!

by John CampanelliFollow

So you can understand why the "striking" "writers/stenographers" at MyDD would want to take whatever dregs they can get. Several people comment about how this is not an endorsement any Democrat would want. Nevertheless, Hillary's MyDD defenders come out in force:

Waiting for the trolls to say that this is an endorsement we don't want.
And wouldn't that be ironic, coming from a group that claims to be able to work across party lines? I wonder if that will be Obama's approach to "bi-partisan" legislation: and a Republican co-signer is one endorsement I don't want.
Mm hmm.
While Obama talks about reaching across the aisle, Hillary has actually done it. And she shows you this capacity again with this endorsement. You see, for Obama, "unity" means "see things my way". If everyone would just buy into his advertising, we'd all be unified? We might even put down our guns and stop going to church so damned much.
That's not unity folks. We've seen the results of "you're with us, or you're against us."


I love that last line, considering how Clinton and Co. treated Bill Richardson's endorsement of Obama.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

utter, full flavor bullshit, tree. cali Jun 2014 #1
have you furthered a republican based attack against the Clintons? bigtree Jun 2014 #2
lol. adorers are so cute- speaking of frothing cali Jun 2014 #3
I do froth adorably, dear bigtree Jun 2014 #4
in my opinion they hated on a dem same as usual but when he dropped his pants he made them nuts roguevalley Jun 2014 #18
that was never any of our business, no matter how we feel about it bigtree Jun 2014 #19
it wasn't but it became so. How the hell do you have an affair when you are the roguevalley Jun 2014 #20
I don't give a damn about anyone's sex life bigtree Jun 2014 #21
its not about what you and I care about. Its about being so stupid and selfish roguevalley Jun 2014 #24
I don't make it a practice of mine to worry about what idiots think bigtree Jun 2014 #25
Clinton was over 70% approval AgingAmerican Jun 2014 #26
. CreekDog Jun 2014 #6
leave it alone bigtree Jun 2014 #8
Yep. blue neen Jun 2014 #5
Scaife and Hillary. Scaife endorses Hillary in 08 Whisp Jun 2014 #9
Don't know if you've heard about this yet: blue neen Jun 2014 #11
it was a lousy answer to the question and a cheap political shot bigtree Jun 2014 #12
Nowhere does the article you link to AgingAmerican Jun 2014 #27
It's there somewhere but Here, knock yourself out: Whisp Jun 2014 #28
Clinton gutting social programs was a war on all of us leftstreet Jun 2014 #7
Excuse me, but I don't identify the Clintons with the Democratic Party. scarletwoman Jun 2014 #10
so Benghazi is fine? bigtree Jun 2014 #13
Benghazi? So, I'm supposed to support Hillary because, Benghazi? scarletwoman Jun 2014 #14
you can't read that as an example? bigtree Jun 2014 #15
I understand what you're saying. I'm just not buying it. scarletwoman Jun 2014 #17
Agree betsuni Jun 2014 #16
» bigtree Jun 2014 #22
Cold Truth, Sir The Magistrate Jun 2014 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The right-wing war on the...»Reply #28