General Discussion

CTyankee

(67,984 posts)

6. I don't think Hillary is hopeless and she sure wouldn't appoint an anti-choicer to SCOTUS.

Tue Jun 10, 2014, 04:00 PM

Jun 2014

Yes, we have a problem with all the big money in politics, but I can't take a real chance of sacrificing my granddaughters to my purity standards. I just can't do that. Too much is at stake. And the RW is laughing at us for that purity, even tho they've got purity issues of their own. My hope is that Warren can pull Hillary to the left more. This is my thinking right now...who knows what changes will happen between now and Nov. 2016...you are right...it is kinda silly at this point...anyway, just my 2 cents right now...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fine I'll say it. Trumad & Cali & now Mineral Man: The Gauntlet has Been Thrown! [View all] misterhighwasted Jun 2014 OP

Thanks for the link. MineralMan Jun 2014 #1

I just don't want us to go through all that Nader stuff again... CTyankee Jun 2014 #2

It was. Even after election day. MineralMan Jun 2014 #3

I don't think Hillary is hopeless and she sure wouldn't appoint an anti-choicer to SCOTUS. CTyankee Jun 2014 #6

I voted for Nader in 2000 Blue_In_AK Jun 2014 #5

Correct. there's no declared candidate which kinda makes this fun. misterhighwasted Jun 2014 #7

How come MineralMan gets 2 links ... GeorgeGist Jun 2014 #4

OMG nooo I did NOT eff that up did I? (must proofread) misterhighwasted Jun 2014 #8