Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(667 posts)

11. I think this is something Obama and the Dems can dig up next fall , and get a LOT of milage

Sun Dec 11, 2011, 02:37 PM

Dec 2011

out of , should the Newtster be the Nominee....

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It's simple [View all] yuiyoshida Feb 2021 OP

Just a guess here but XanaDUer Dec 2011 #1

+1 000 000 000 kestrel91316 Dec 2011 #7

Ain't that the truth. Shamefully AllyCat Dec 2011 #16

Newt: this is not about "our" kids, it's about "their" kids Enrique Dec 2011 #4

No. They are rich, therefore better than poor children. Kingofalldems Dec 2011 #5

Rich kids have parents who have worked hard for their money sibelian Dec 2011 #6

Only the poor.... lindac007 Dec 2011 #8

Trust Fund Kiddies don't need to learn the value of hard work. Ikonoklast Dec 2011 #10

Poor, working class, MINORITY kids; I'l bet they really mean. Odin2005 Dec 2011 #12

My guess is that the answer is "no." The Genealogist Dec 2011 #15

Of course not Prophet 451 Dec 2011 #17