Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(39,181 posts)

10. He didn't make a prediction so why are you attacking him?

Wed Jun 11, 2014, 10:03 AM

Jun 2014

he knows that his method works best on general elections where there is a greater depth and breadth of data available.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

538 and Krugman Eric Cantor upset what happened. [View all] Ichingcarpenter Jun 2014 OP

I said in a earlier thread (months ago) that Nate Silver is an idiot. Timez Squarez Jun 2014 #2

Absolutely correct Reter Jun 2014 #6

I was gonna include Krugman's take also Ichingcarpenter Jun 2014 #4

I don't think Silver made a prediction. hack89 Jun 2014 #5

He needs to work on his methods, then. MADem Jun 2014 #8

He didn't make a prediction so why are you attacking him? hack89 Jun 2014 #10

I took 2 semesters in Political Science on Polling Ichingcarpenter Jun 2014 #14

Democrats voted in the primary Demsrule86 Jun 2014 #7

Well, they need to do several things to win this thing, then. MADem Jun 2014 #12

The other factor involved in Cantor's defeat is Larkspur Jun 2014 #11

All politics is local! nt MADem Jun 2014 #16