Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Chuck Hagel is Rocking The House - dignified, passionate, feisty, knocking down all the tea party [View all]Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)8. Full transcript, a thing of uninterrupted beauty:
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2014/06/11/transcript-hagels-opening-statement-during-testimony-bergdahl-swap
I appreciate the opportunity to discuss the recovery of Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, and the transfer of five detainees from Guantanamo Bay to Qatar. And I appreciate having the Department of Defense General Counsel Stephen Preston, here with me. Mr. Preston was one of our negotiators in Qatar and signed on behalf of the U.S. the Memorandum of Understanding between the Governments of Qatar and the United States. Also here representing the Joint Chiefs of Staff is Brigadier General Pat White, who is the Director of the Joint Staff's Pakistan/Afghanistan Coordination Cell and who helped coordinate the Bergdahl recovery on behalf of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dempsey. The Vice Chairman of the Joints Chiefs, Admiral Winnefeld, will join us for the closed portion of this hearing. As you know, General Dempsey and Admiral Winnefeld played a critical role in the meetings at the National Security Council leading up to Sergeant Bergdahl's release and supported the decision to move forward with this prisoner exchange.
In my statement today, I will address the issues Chairman McKeon raised when he asked me to testify, and explain why it was urgent to pursue Sergeant Bergdahl's release, why we decided to move forward with the detainee transfer, and why it was fully consistent with U.S. law, our nation's interests, and our military's core values.
Mr. Chairman, I want to be clear on one fundamental point - I would never sign off on any decision that I did not feel was in the best interests of this country. Nor would the President of the United States, who made the final decision with the full support of his national security team.
There are legitimate questions about this prisoner exchange, and Congress obviously has an important oversight role to play in all military and intelligence matters. As a former member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, I appreciate the vital role Congress plays in our national security. And I will present to this committee - within the limits of an open, unclassified, hearing, and in more detail in the closed, classified, hearing - everything I can to assure you that this prisoner exchange was done legally, with substantial mitigation of risk, and in the national interest of our country.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Chuck Hagel is Rocking The House - dignified, passionate, feisty, knocking down all the tea party [View all]
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
OP
Confounding is such a good word for what Hagel is doing. A million little cuts at the body of
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
#2
What did he say, because that may have set the tone for the lack of grilling that the insolent
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
#5
Every Democratic with man pants on should memorize every response to every tea bag talking point.
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
#32
Boom! I hear the recons were whining because they thought Obama was trying to take credit..
Cha
Jun 2014
#45
Thank you. The whole hearing was priceless and a direct blow to the empty skull of the media and
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
#23
Free Republic haters are going insane from the thrashing of their talking points.
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
#10
The questions about why Berghdahl is not in America were so insane it sucked all the air out
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
#12
No sane person wants to identify as a Republican, he was a member of the party once known
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
#14
I LOVE the opportunity to praise a Republican! It reminds me that there are good people everywhere
DesertDiamond
Jun 2014
#25
We all remember the old Republican Party, it had many honorable members, but that was a
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
#31
If the media is OK with dredging up Bergdahl's past as relevant, because of possible desertion, why
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
#39
He would also not pray to Jesus for rain, and then mock native Indians for doing the same.
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
#42
He is Obama's Secretary of Defence and just defended his boss with distinction. Maybe
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
#48
Because after Hagel surgically removed all the propaganda, whining about that was all they had left.
Fred Sanders
Jun 2014
#60