Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 02:20 PM Jun 2014

Stochastic terrorism [View all]

I first posted this on another thread but decided to make it an OP in order to increase public awareness of the concept. Anyone who does Facebook or Twitter might want to help spread it.

Stochastic terrorism is the use of mass communications to incite random actors to carry out violent or terrorist acts that are statistically predictable but individually unpredictable. In short, remote-control murder by lone wolf.

This is what occurs when Bin Laden releases a video that stirs random extremists halfway around the globe to commit a bombing or shooting.

This is also the term for what Beck, O'Reilly, Hannity, and others do. And this is what led directly and predictably to a number of cases of ideologically-motivated murder similar to the Tucson shootings. As of this writing, there is no evidence to link Jared Loughner to a specific source of incitement; but some of the other cases can be clearly linked.

The stochastic terrorist is the person who is responsible for the incitement. For example they go on radio or television and stir up hatred toward a particular person or group.

The random actor, or "lone wolf" as the term is used in law enforcement and intel, is the person who responds to the incitement by carrying out the violent or terrorist act against the target person or group. For example they shoot someone or detonate a bomb. While their action may have been statistically predictable (e.g. "given sufficient provocation, someone will probably do such-and-such&quot , the specific person and the specific act are not yet predictable.



http://stochasticterrorism.blogspot.com
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stochastic terrorism [View all] Jackpine Radical Jun 2014 OP
Kick. Extremely important. Hekate Jun 2014 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Adam051188 Jun 2014 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Adam051188 Jun 2014 #4
This post is a kind of stochastic terrorism. JackRiddler Jun 2014 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author Adam051188 Jun 2014 #20
You and the Kellogg Eugenics Board JackRiddler Jun 2014 #22
Protecting free speech is the first priority. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #3
I agree with you to some degree. I also think that 1) No, governments should not be allowed to DesertDiamond Jun 2014 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Adam051188 Jun 2014 #14
But the average person can't afford to bankroll a TV news channel CJCRANE Jun 2014 #13
It should not be a legal category, no. JackRiddler Jun 2014 #17
I have difficulty seeing the difference between "stochastic terrorism" and "disturbed people do Brickbat Jun 2014 #5
I'm having the same difficulty, plus 1st Amendment concerns. n/t ColesCountyDem Jun 2014 #6
I know, you and others are worried about a slippery slope of free speech. Allowing free speech to DesertDiamond Jun 2014 #9
Who decides? You? Me? Some government agency? ColesCountyDem Jun 2014 #10
Is this "yelling fire"? I'm also opposed to censorship, but I know stochastic terrorism is real. Scuba Jun 2014 #11
No, it isn't. ColesCountyDem Jun 2014 #15
Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #19
Besides, yelling fire in a crowded theater is not illegal. NYC Liberal Jun 2014 #26
Correct. n/t ColesCountyDem Jun 2014 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author Adam051188 Jun 2014 #18
There are people who stand to benefit from turning us against each other. Divide and conquer. DesertDiamond Jun 2014 #8
some of whom will hear voices regardless reddread Jun 2014 #32
This is important, LWolf Jun 2014 #12
We own the airwaves maindawg Jun 2014 #21
Very interesting. I posted this thread describing stochastic terrorism. Then lots of people Jackpine Radical Jun 2014 #23
The principles on which the Bill of Rights are based... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2014 #24
One can decry a noxious message. Jackpine Radical Jun 2014 #25
I'd like that. discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2014 #29
I agree. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #30
In this society, right-wing stochastic terrorism is as rampant on the airwaves as are guns on the indepat Jun 2014 #27
K & R Shankapotomus Jun 2014 #31
Criminal negligence Livingtree Oct 2014 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Stochastic terrorism