Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pbmus

(13,141 posts)
55. I would definitely refine your search to information
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 03:32 PM
Jun 2014

that includes international studies because if you only get USA studies, they are probably biased ..

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Playing Word Games is Essentially How They Always WIN MagickMuffin Jun 2014 #1
Not peer reviewed articles....sorry.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #2
I used lead paints as a child... LanternWaste Jun 2014 #8
Well that explains THAT! VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #12
And plenty of cigarette smokers are also alive. So what? pnwmom Jun 2014 #49
I tried truvia had a horrible taste... Historic NY Jun 2014 #59
Not the same thing. TeeYiYi Jun 2014 #118
PLOS One is a peer reviwed journal. LisaL Jun 2014 #133
Yes, I notice it says that up at the top of the article at the link. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #152
So long as it is profitable, isn't that all that matters? sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #3
Absolutely NOT ... Europeans are too smart ...nt pbmus Jun 2014 #5
Stevia is not used in Europe? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #28
I understand nothing ... we are talking about TRUVIA ... nt pbmus Jun 2014 #32
You do understand you CAN buy Erithrytol in a health food store...not just IN Truvia? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #37
Beware psyllium husks are extremely dangerous to your health and well being ...nt pbmus Jun 2014 #38
Water is extremely dangerous to your health and well being if drunk in sufficient quantities! VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #39
Life as we know it ends in death ... nt pbmus Jun 2014 #47
Exactly! VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #83
Finally we agree on something ... albeit a little grim ... nt pbmus Jun 2014 #150
According to Wikipedia, Truvia is available in Europe. Chiyo-chichi Jun 2014 #56
Blow me down with a feather ... probably for not much longer ...nt pbmus Jun 2014 #57
And what on earth would give you THAT idea? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #84
naturalnews.com is not a valid source for anything. MineralMan Jun 2014 #4
I think the poster put in two links ... pbmus Jun 2014 #7
Yes. The other link is not a peer reviewed journal. MineralMan Jun 2014 #9
I would carefully read all of the information about the other link .... pbmus Jun 2014 #10
Thanks for the advice. MineralMan Jun 2014 #13
When you get cancer like I have , you carefully review everything ... pbmus Jun 2014 #15
I'm sorry to hear that. Food in the US, it is hard to even try to eat a healthy diet or feed it to sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #71
No, it's not misleading. LisaL Jun 2014 #135
You are completely wrong. LisaL Jun 2014 #134
Thank you. As I said, DUers are extremely smart at doing their own research and don't sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #16
Oh, you are protected from information very well ... nt pbmus Jun 2014 #17
Yes, I know, which is why I said, 'we don't need to be protected' because we are capable sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #21
You are wise and thoughtful ... thank you for being a part of DU ..nt pbmus Jun 2014 #23
I think it is up to us to discern whether THIS article is valid. We ARE old enough and experienced sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #14
Thank you for your comment. MineralMan Jun 2014 #19
Yes, you have successfully hidden enough information to ban the poster ...nt pbmus Jun 2014 #20
Me? None of those alerts were mine, nor was I on any MineralMan Jun 2014 #22
I stand corrected ... DU is an open forum designed to intelligently pbmus Jun 2014 #24
Thank you. You apparently jumped to an incorrect conclusion. MineralMan Jun 2014 #26
I have jumped many times, lately to reading and understanding a direct pbmus Jun 2014 #129
Is that supposed to mean something that refutes anything I said? In fact if anything, it confirms sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #27
No fool like an old fool, as the saying goes. REP Jun 2014 #40
I like to err on the side of caution when it comes to health issues and foods where there is any sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #46
Just excused myself from this jury. JaneyVee Jun 2014 #6
I'll give it a try next time I get an infestation herding cats Jun 2014 #11
Jury results Zorra Jun 2014 #18
Truvia also makes monkeys spastic! jberryhill Jun 2014 #132
"Natural News" has ZERO credibilibilty. Archae Jun 2014 #25
Indeed. One only has to look at the ads in the MineralMan Jun 2014 #29
Like psyllium husks for use as a fiber ... omg, whats next .... pbmus Jun 2014 #35
Ever seen any of the ADS on DU? sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #36
DU ads are served from Google. MineralMan Jun 2014 #41
It's a business, isn't it? As for DU, I am a star member also, but have taken the trouble to look sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #48
Archae did ... pbmus Jun 2014 #50
That information is about the sources. That it can be used as an insecticide isn't very encouraging sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #53
I would definitely refine your search to information pbmus Jun 2014 #55
Yes, that is good advice as when money is involved here, we get all sorts of sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #58
Thank you for your thoughtful research and wise decision ... pbmus Jun 2014 #60
How sad. As I recall DU was opposed to Corps like Monsanto from its inception. In fact it was here sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #64
Not true....all you needed to do was go to Wikipedia VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #87
I went way further than Wikipedia and found out that the Manufacturers lost a Civil Lawsuit sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #139
So? Most of the produce we eat today is not natural....in that WE have always modified it.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #155
water is a powerful insecticide.... mike_c Jun 2014 #76
Bt is not safe in the quantities we are spraying and ingesting it .. pbmus Jun 2014 #119
I'm sorry, but you're simply incorrect.... mike_c Jun 2014 #153
I am old enough to have friends who farmed ... and some are still my friends .. pbmus Jun 2014 #180
I suppose we'll simply have to agree to disagree.... mike_c Jun 2014 #181
if a fruit fly gets no fruit...also known as sugar....they die....Stevia is not a sugar..... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #86
Exactly ... well said ... nt pbmus Jun 2014 #126
The Plos editorial board consists of USA doctors pbmus Jun 2014 #30
So are you saying the product is safe for human consumption? Is there anything that counters sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #31
The Plos editorial board consists of pbmus Jun 2014 #34
I'm doing my best to get some answers from those who have attacked the source, regarding the sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #42
Because of your stature in DU, you will probably not get challenged ... pbmus Jun 2014 #44
Lol, well I am pretty immune to attempts to avoid a topic by making fun of the questioner. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #51
This hubris thinking on DU is especially apparent pbmus Jun 2014 #52
Many have noticed this phenomenon of people assigning themselves to the role of sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #67
Someone seems to be looking OUT for those that want to spread false information.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #91
I notice you provided no link so we can decide how credible that source is. But, I see it does not sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #138
You can do exactly what I did and what you SHOULD have done BEFORE you spread these hair on fire lie VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #158
That was in the OP, did you read the links in the OP? Are you a supporter of genetically altered sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #164
Its not "genetically modified" VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #167
How about ones that make fun of you after they prove you wrong? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #94
Please alert on that person making fun of you ... pbmus Jun 2014 #120
I haven't had that experience. Perhaps you have? sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #122
Because some people present themselves as some sort of expert....and they they prove theyd VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #159
Yes there is... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #89
especially if it is from any website not authorized by you or wikipedia... nt pbmus Jun 2014 #121
At least my link provides the source of the data.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #160
Yes I AM as the FDA says so.....are you goign to say THEY are unreliable now too? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #157
If they flies have no sugar to eat....they die....doesn't mean its poisonous! VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #33
Sorry, they flies are not sugar eaters, they die, and it does mean sugar is poison ...nt pbmus Jun 2014 #127
fruit flies eat fruit....which ARE carbs Which ARE sugars.....and YES sugar has levels that are VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #161
Yep, one of two sites I can think of... GoCubsGo Jun 2014 #43
And the Cubbies are gonna win this year ... nt pbmus Jun 2014 #45
Yes. They'll win roughly 40% of the games they play this season. GoCubsGo Jun 2014 #54
Wait til next century. They're going to kick ass! n/t ieoeja Jun 2014 #62
Whatever. GoCubsGo Jun 2014 #88
What sites do you trust? I have done a quick scan for info on Truvia due to this OP. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #65
the ingredients Stevia and...a journalist would probably know to look up ingredients...not tradename VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #90
Sites that have actual peer-reviewed research. GoCubsGo Jun 2014 #99
Plos is a peer reviewed site with over 5800 editors ... pbmus Jun 2014 #123
This message was self-deleted by its author GoCubsGo Jun 2014 #145
That's nice. GoCubsGo Jun 2014 #147
NOT ... nt pbmus Jun 2014 #148
Well it's always wise not the the word of any ONE source. As I said before, DUers are pretty smart sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #124
You are reading way to much and critical thinking is your strong suit ... pbmus Jun 2014 #128
Lol, well if there are people here so sensitive that they cannot accept facts, there's not much sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #136
You are really a gem to DU ... thanks again for your acceptance of facts ..nt pbmus Jun 2014 #141
Thank you, and so are you. We need more discussion and less 'shut it DOWN' nonsense to keep sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #143
And that is one hearty AMEN ... nt pbmus Jun 2014 #151
Nobody is "monitoring" anyone. GoCubsGo Jun 2014 #146
This is one of the most highly monitored sites on the internet ... nt pbmus Jun 2014 #149
That would be awesome if true. ieoeja Jun 2014 #61
"Natural News" is known to burst peoples' hair into flames. chrisa Jun 2014 #63
LOL ... nt pbmus Jun 2014 #72
Pardon me for being the turd in the punchbowl. Chocolate can kills dogs. Yet we eat it all the time. dballance Jun 2014 #66
Yup, that site is horrendously overadvertised with health nut stuff .... pbmus Jun 2014 #68
Too bad the discussion wasn't more about the product than about the source. There were two sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #69
You are way to thoughtful for DU ... pbmus Jun 2014 #70
Mmm so their claims WERE false. I only scanned the info, so missed that a lawsuit had been won sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #73
come on you are blowing it waaaaay out of proportion here... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #92
I haven't even done a bowl and you are making me howl here ... nt pbmus Jun 2014 #116
Not sure what that comment means so could you post it again and rephrase it? sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #125
Cargill. I think that may say a whole lot! nt WhiteTara Jun 2014 #74
of course.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #95
LOL. Naturalnews... SidDithers Jun 2014 #75
Yep, it is full of health nut stuff ... pbmus Jun 2014 #77
It's full of horseshit medical woo... SidDithers Jun 2014 #78
Can you point me to some of that right wing conspiracy stuff ... pbmus Jun 2014 #79
Here's a couple headlines... SidDithers Jun 2014 #80
The first headline was written by the guardian, forbes and others before pbmus Jun 2014 #93
As I said, Adams' defenders are hilarious... SidDithers Jun 2014 #96
So you reject 98 % healthy related information because of pbmus Jun 2014 #103
If you think you're getting actual health related information from naturalnews... SidDithers Jun 2014 #104
Telling another member they are wrong is an alert offense ... pbmus Jun 2014 #109
Sure they have... SidDithers Jun 2014 #110
and telling someone they have "paid hubris" is also banning material ... pbmus Jun 2014 #111
try Wikipedia.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #97
So ... pbmus Jun 2014 #98
SO??? That's the "egregious" ingredient in Truvia you all are talking about.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #101
Quite frankly I do not care if you ingest truvia everyday for the next 50 yrs ... nt pbmus Jun 2014 #112
frankly I don't care if you believe bullshit from bullshit websites....I am not going to let it VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #114
LMAO...you are tooo funny ...nt pbmus Jun 2014 #115
The trouble with Natural News... LeftishBrit Jun 2014 #178
I have learned a lot from this thread. So thanks to the OP for introducing us to this product and sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #140
And that's a problem why? JoeyT Jun 2014 #81
+1...nt SidDithers Jun 2014 #82
There is another link to the research ... nt pbmus Jun 2014 #85
and they both suck! VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #102
The editorial board on Plos has more education than many could get in a million lifetimes ...nt pbmus Jun 2014 #105
and hawking this bullshit? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #107
And? I fail to see your point. LisaL Jun 2014 #137
OHHHHHHH so its the fruit flies we are concerned about not humans! VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #162
This has become such an interesting thread where I have have learned so much I didn't know before. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #144
not even basically....that's EXACTLY what it does.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #100
Now that is a true statement that I can agree with ... nt pbmus Jun 2014 #117
awesome d_r Jun 2014 #106
From the PLOS ONE article ... GeorgeGist Jun 2014 #108
Great research, keep reading ...nt pbmus Jun 2014 #113
interesting study, such a boring read. perhaps the company will have 2 markets for their product. Sunlei Jun 2014 #130
Does it work on mosquitos? jberryhill Jun 2014 #131
OK, Just for the information defacto7 Jun 2014 #142
The civil suits mentioned in this thread concerned ad use of "Natural", not safety of consumption. pinto Jun 2014 #154
Thanks for that link. So the OP link that a few people are upset about was CORRECT. Truvia can be sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #156
but it does NOT mean it is harmful to humans....in fact the FDA says that it is NOT harmful VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #163
Genetically altered products are NOT natural. And from the research I have done so far, no one knows sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #165
it is NOT "genetically" altered.....you need to read what you are writing about.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #166
I read the claims made in the lawsuit against Cargill for false advertising, in which the sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #172
as I said...."not natural" is not the same thing as "genetically modified" I HAVE read the article VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #173
As I said, the lawsuit stated that the the product contained genetically modified sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #174
and I have told you what "genetically modified" means..... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #175
I will take the court's description of what 'genitically modified' means. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #179
The use and misuse of "natural" has become widespread. Some natural food markets have been sued. pinto Jun 2014 #169
Words like "powerful" and "shocked" are not used in scientific research. Avalux Jun 2014 #168
Here you go. fifthoffive Jun 2014 #170
What a surprise! One of Frankenstein's monsters gets discovered early. nolabels Jun 2014 #171
Use friggen natural sugar in moderation HockeyMom Jun 2014 #176
wish I'd had some Truvia dem in texas Jun 2014 #177
Stevia IS sold unadulterated shanti Jun 2014 #182
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Truvia sweetener a powerf...»Reply #55