Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If you can't charge more for age then shouldn't each child have the same premium as a 90 year old dkf Apr 2012 #1
3 times more CAPHAVOC Apr 2012 #2
Yup. This is what they really want from the mandate...young people paying for older people. dkf Apr 2012 #3
Sure does. CAPHAVOC Apr 2012 #5
I'm really not understanding your comparison between health insurance and social security. HiPointDem Apr 2012 #12
Me too. CAPHAVOC Apr 2012 #13
In 1950 (10 years after SS started paying out) there were 18 workers paying in for every HiPointDem Apr 2012 #15
OK but can't they just cash in our Bonds to pay us? CAPHAVOC Apr 2012 #17
People should never under any circumstances be charged according to their risk factors eridani Apr 2012 #23
I agree, but they are and always have been when buying private insurance. Unlike with HiPointDem Apr 2012 #24
Exactly--which is why private insurance must either be ended-- eridani Apr 2012 #25
Absofuckinglutely eridani Apr 2012 #7
So a family plan should be paid per person covered, not the same amount for 10 kids vs 1. dkf Apr 2012 #9
Under the proposed Washington Health Security Trust (state single payer)-- eridani Apr 2012 #22
Kids are always getting sick. dkf Apr 2012 #26
So what? $100-$150 per adult 18-65 per month, eridani Apr 2012 #27
We all know it isn't as good as it should be, but it is better than nothing Motown_Johnny Apr 2012 #4
The consequences of being on this list of very naughty boys and girls-- eridani Apr 2012 #8
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Apr 2012 #6
Can we at least stop calling it health care reform? n/t Egalitarian Thug Apr 2012 #10
I simply called it a health insurance bill once the Senate deleted the Public Option in its entirety Selatius Apr 2012 #11
You left off the rest of the sentence. Egalitarian Thug Apr 2012 #20
Yeah, really. BlueIris Apr 2012 #21
It's simply ProSense Apr 2012 #14
A whole lot of semantics zipplewrath Apr 2012 #16
It is a regulation. CAPHAVOC Apr 2012 #18
Yup zipplewrath Apr 2012 #19
So, in 25 words or less, please explain eridani Apr 2012 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Health Care Reform—the Ch...»Reply #26